All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, hendersm@shaw.ca, bhelgaas@google.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, tiwai@suse.de
Subject: + resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:41:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410204159.bY7aN%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: resource: fix integer overflow at reallocation
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: resource: fix integer overflow at reallocation

We've got a bug report indicating a kernel panic at booting on an x86-32
system, and it turned out to be the invalid PCI resource assigned after
reallocation.  __find_resource() first aligns the resource start address
and resets the end address with start+size-1 accordingly, then checks
whether it's contained.  Here the end address may overflow the integer,
although resource_contains() still returns true because the function
validates only start and end address.  So this ends up with returning an
invalid resource (start > end).

There was already an attempt to cover such a problem in the commit
47ea91b4052d ("Resource: fix wrong resource window calculation"), but this
case is an overseen one.

This patch adds the validity check of the newly calculated resource for
avoiding the integer overflow problem.

Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1086739
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/s5hpo37d5l8.wl-tiwai@suse.de
Fixes: 23c570a67448 ("resource: ability to resize an allocated resource")
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reported-by: Michael Henders <hendersm@shaw.ca>
Tested-by: Michael Henders <hendersm@shaw.ca>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 kernel/resource.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN kernel/resource.c~resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1 kernel/resource.c
--- a/kernel/resource.c~resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1
+++ a/kernel/resource.c
@@ -651,7 +651,8 @@ static int __find_resource(struct resour
 			alloc.start = constraint->alignf(constraint->alignf_data, &avail,
 					size, constraint->align);
 			alloc.end = alloc.start + size - 1;
-			if (resource_contains(&avail, &alloc)) {
+			if (alloc.start <= alloc.end &&
+			    resource_contains(&avail, &alloc)) {
 				new->start = alloc.start;
 				new->end = alloc.end;
 				return 0;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from tiwai@suse.de are

resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1.patch
resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-04-10 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180410204159.bY7aN%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hendersm@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.