All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: virtio@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [virtio] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] notifications:notifications as basic virtio facility
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:11:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411151133.7754b789.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523398287-25480-3-git-send-email-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:11:26 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Let's introduce notifications as basic virtio facility early on. This
> shall not only increase the cohesion between core and transport
> description by having a well-defined  place where notifications are
> introduced, but also give us the opportunity to explain some
> discrepancies.
> 
> Namely notifications send by the device to the driver were often called

s/send/sent/

> interrupts prior v1.1. Getting completely rid of that terminology is

s/prior/prior to/

> however not viable in case of some names.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  content.tex |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 4ccb823..87cc0e2 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ device consists of the following parts:
>  \begin{itemize}
>  \item Device status field
>  \item Feature bits
> +\item Notifications
>  \item Device Configuration space
>  \item One or more virtqueues
>  \end{itemize}
> @@ -150,6 +151,36 @@ requirements documented within these legacy interface sections.
>  Specification text within these sections generally does not apply
>  to non-transitional devices.
>  
> +\section{Notifications}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device
> +/ Notifications}
> +
> +The notion of sending a notification (driver to device or device
> +to driver) plays an important role in this specification. The
> +modus operandi of the notifications is transport specific.
> +
> +There are three types of notifications: 
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item device configuration space notification
> +\item available buffers notification
> +\item used buffer notifications. 
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +The recipient of device configuration space notifications and use buffer

s/use/used/

> +notifications is the driver. These indicate that a configuration space
> +has changed and that a buffer may have been made used on a virtqueue
> +(designated by the notification) respectively. The recipient of available
> +buffers notifications is the device. Such notifications indicates that a

s/indicates/indicate/

> +buffer may have been made available on a virtqueue (designated by the
> +notification). The semantic as well as other important aspects  of the
> +notifications is specified in detail in the following chapters.

Hm... I'd reword that a bit, and I'd not focus explicitly on the
recipient. What about:

"Device configuration space notifications and used buffer notifications
are sent by the device, the recipient is the driver. A device
configuration space notification indicates that a configuration space
has changed; a used buffer notification indicates that a buffer may
have been made used on the virtqueue designated by the notification.

Available buffer notifications are sent by the driver, the recipient is
the device. This type of notification indicates that a buffer may have
been made available on the virtqueue designated by the notification.

The semantic, the transport-specific implementations and other
important aspects of the different notifications are specified in detail
in the following chapters."

> +
> +Most transports implement notifications sent by the device to the
> +driver using interrupts. Due to this in previous versions of this

s/Due to this/Therefore,/ ?

> +specification, these notifications were often called interrupts.
> +Some names defined in this specification still retain this interrupt
> +terminology. Occasionally we also use the term event to refer to
> +a notification or a receipt of a notification.

"Occasionally, the term 'event' is used..." (I'd like to avoid 'we'.)

> +
>  \section{Device Configuration Space}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Device Configuration Space}
>  
>  Device configuration space is generally used for rarely-changing or


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-11 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10 22:11 [virtio] [RFC PATCH 0/3] rework notifications terminology Halil Pasic
2018-04-10 22:11 ` [virtio] [RFC PATCH 1/3] notifications: unify notifications wording in core Halil Pasic
2018-04-11  2:19   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-11 10:58     ` Halil Pasic
2018-04-11 11:47       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-11 12:35     ` [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] " Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-11 12:55       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-11 13:11         ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-10 22:11 ` [virtio] [RFC PATCH 2/3] notifications:notifications as basic virtio facility Halil Pasic
2018-04-11 13:11   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-04-10 22:11 ` [virtio] [RFC PATCH 3/3] ccw: map common notifications terminology to ccw Halil Pasic
2018-04-11  7:50   ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2018-04-11 13:42     ` [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] " Halil Pasic
2018-04-11 16:00       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-12 11:12         ` Halil Pasic
2018-04-13  9:47           ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-20 14:53 ` [virtio] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] rework notifications terminology Halil Pasic
2018-04-20 15:44   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180411151133.7754b789.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.