From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/6] bnxt_en: do not allow wildcard matches for L2
 flows
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:50:14 -0400
Message-ID: <20180411205014.GE33938@C02RW35GFVH8.dhcp.broadcom.net>
References: <1523461818-15774-1-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com>
 <1523461818-15774-3-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com>
 <20180411114303.6f927c45@cakuba.netronome.com>
 <20180411203152.GD33938@C02RW35GFVH8.dhcp.broadcom.net>
 <CACKFLi=W=0a+2pap5Yis7_ZCRrP+cGxxik6XBLnEPws+ge873g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-qt0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:40251 "EHLO
        mail-qt0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932210AbeDKUuS (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:50:18 -0400
Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id g5so3612738qth.7
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACKFLi=W=0a+2pap5Yis7_ZCRrP+cGxxik6XBLnEPws+ge873g@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:41:31PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:43:14AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:50:14 -0400, Michael Chan wrote:
> >> > @@ -764,6 +788,41 @@ static bool bnxt_tc_can_offload(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_tc_flow *flow)
> >> >             return false;
> >> >     }
> >> >
> >> > +   /* Currently source/dest MAC cannot be partial wildcard  */
> >> > +   if (bits_set(&flow->l2_key.smac, sizeof(flow->l2_key.smac)) &&
> >> > +       !is_exactmatch(flow->l2_mask.smac, sizeof(flow->l2_mask.smac))) {
> >> > +           netdev_info(bp->dev, "Wildcard match unsupported for Source MAC\n");
> >>
> >> This wouldn't be something to do in net, but how do you feel about
> >> using extack for messages like this?
> >>
> >
> > I agree 'net' would not have been the place for a change like that, but
> > I do think that would be a good idea.  It looks like we could easily
> > change the ndo_setup_tc to something like this:
> >
> >         int                     (*ndo_setup_tc)(struct net_device *dev,
> >                                                 enum tc_setup_type type,
> >                                                 void *type_data,
> >                                                 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> 
> I think the extack pointer is already in the tc_cls_common_offload
> struct inside tc_cls_flower_offload struct.

True, but I'm not sure that tc_cls_common_offload is used in all cases.
Take red_offload() as one of those.