From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB: make INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS configurable Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:51:53 -0600 Message-ID: <20180416145153.GA23029@ziepe.ca> References: <20180413070644.11974-1-gthelen@google.com> <20180415120636.GA10759@infradead.org> <20180416085620.GA30363@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180416085620.GA30363@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Greg Thelen , Doug Ledford , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Tarick Bedeir List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 01:56:20AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:02:12AM +0000, Greg Thelen wrote: > > I think I've identified the set of options which use > > INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS without a kconfig depends: > > * CIFS_SMB_DIRECT > > * INFINIBAND_SRPT > > * NVME_RDMA > > * NVME_TARGET_RDMA > > > > I have patches for the above, but need to finish the commit logs. Let me > > know if they'll be nacked and I'll just patch my kernel and forget > > upstreaming. > > I think those are what is needed. But better do a full cycle through > the build bot first.. Yes, you have to post the full series and have the build bots say it is clean, collect acks from the various maintainers and then we can apply the whole thing through RDMA.. I n't want to apply kconfig changes piecemeal, we just get bug reports from build bots that way. Jason