From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dcache: account external names as indirectly reclaimable memory
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:44:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180417064414.GX17484@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6413098-b37c-a6b8-45cb-ce273ff16c29@suse.cz>
[the head of the thread is http://lkml.kernel.org/r/08524819-14ef-81d0-fa90-d7af13c6b9d5@suse.cz]
On Mon 16-04-18 21:57:50, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 04/16/2018 02:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 16-04-18 14:06:21, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>
> >> For example the percpu (and other) array caches...
> >>
> >>> maybe it will turn out that such a large
> >>> portion of the chache would need to duplicate the state that a
> >>> completely new cache would be more reasonable.
> >>
> >> I'm afraid that's the case, yes.
> >>
> >>> Is this worth exploring
> >>> at least? I mean something like this should help with the fragmentation
> >>> already AFAIU. Accounting would be just free on top.
> >>
> >> Yep. It could be also CONFIG_urable so smaller systems don't need to
> >> deal with the memory overhead of this.
> >>
> >> So do we put it on LSF/MM agenda?
> >
> > If you volunteer to lead the discussion, then I do not have any
> > objections.
>
> Sure, let's add the topic of SLAB_MINIMIZE_WASTE [1] as well.
>
> Something like "Supporting reclaimable kmalloc caches and large
> non-buddy-sized objects in slab allocators" ?
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=152156671614796&w=2
OK, noted.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-05 13:37 [PATCH 0/3] indirectly reclaimable memory Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-11 13:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-11 13:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-11 13:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-12 6:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-12 11:52 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-12 14:38 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-12 14:38 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-12 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-12 14:57 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-12 14:57 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-13 6:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-13 12:13 ` vinayak menon
2018-04-25 3:49 ` Vijayanand Jitta
2018-04-25 12:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 12:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 15:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-25 16:48 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 16:48 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 17:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-25 17:23 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 17:23 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 15:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-25 16:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-05 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: add indirectly reclaimable memory to MemAvailable Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: treat indirectly reclaimable memory as available in MemAvailable Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] dcache: account external names as indirectly reclaimable memory Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-12 21:17 ` Al Viro
2018-03-12 22:36 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-12 22:36 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-13 0:45 ` Al Viro
2018-04-05 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2018-04-06 10:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-06 10:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-13 13:35 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-13 13:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-13 14:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-13 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-13 14:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-04-16 11:41 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-16 12:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-16 12:27 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-16 19:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-17 6:44 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-04-16 13:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-17 11:24 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-17 11:24 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180417064414.GX17484@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.