From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:08:02 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6ull: add UART5 input select register definition In-Reply-To: <0977332f-fb45-6d6d-8643-6efdce5d14a2@i2se.com> References: <1522189496-27837-1-git-send-email-gerg@linux-m68k.org> <4f010fbd-9f6a-1f4e-efb5-564fba1b6cf6@i2se.com> <0977332f-fb45-6d6d-8643-6efdce5d14a2@i2se.com> Message-ID: <20180418030801.GP25429@dragon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:17:14AM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote: > >I'm okay with the second version of the patch, but i noticed that > >at least UART5_RTS_B_SELECT_INPUT is also affected. > > > >The bits for the iMX6UL: > > > >000 CSI_DATA03_ALT8 ? Selecting Pad: CSI_DATA03 for Mode: ALT8 > >001 GPIO1_IO08_ALT8 ? Selecting Pad: GPIO1_IO08 for Mode: ALT8 > >010 GPIO1_IO09_ALT8 ? Selecting Pad: GPIO1_IO09 for Mode: ALT8 > >011 ENET1_RX_EN_ALT1 ? Selecting Pad: ENET1_RX_EN for Mode: ALT1 > >100 ENET1_TX_DATA0_ALT1 ? Selecting Pad: ENET1_TX_DATA0 for Mode: ALT1 > >101 CSI_DATA02_ALT8 ? Selecting Pad: CSI_DATA02 for Mode: ALT8 > > > >But for the iMX6ULL: > > > >000 CSI_DATA03_ALT8 ? Selecting Pad: CSI_DATA03 for Mode: ALT8 > >001 GPIO1_IO08_ALT8 ? Selecting Pad: GPIO1_IO08 for Mode: ALT8 > >010 GPIO1_IO09_ALT8 ? Selecting Pad: GPIO1_IO09 for Mode: ALT8 > >011 UART1_CTS_B_ALT9 ? Selecting Pad: UART1_CTS_B for Mode: ALT9 > >100 UART1_RTS_B_ALT9 ? Selecting Pad: UART1_RTS_B for Mode: ALT9 > >101 ENET1_RX_EN_ALT1 ? Selecting Pad: ENET1_RX_EN for Mode: ALT1 > >110 ENET1_TX_DATA0_ALT1 ? Selecting Pad: ENET1_TX_DATA0 for Mode: ALT1 > >111 CSI_DATA02_ALT8 ? Selecting Pad: CSI_DATA02 for Mode: ALT8 > > > >Comparing the datasheets isn't fun ... > > > >Should i provide a patch for this or is there a easier way to > >figure out all the differences? > > gentle ping ... You're welcomed to send a patch for that. Shawn