From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:02:30 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] PCI: aardvark: misc fixes and improvements Message-ID: <20180418130230.GB22463@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180406145536.19637-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20180409162356.GB14533@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> <20180409205433.4eb78a45@windsurf> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180409205433.4eb78a45@windsurf> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Antoine Tenart , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Gregory Clement , Maxime Chevallier , Nadav Haklai , Victor Gu , Miqu??l Raynal , Bjorn Helgaas , Wilson Ding , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+bjorn=helgaas.com@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:54:33PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello Lorenzo, > > Thanks for your feedback! > > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:23:56 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > it is not just improvements, these look like significant bug fixes too. > > > > Let me know which patches we should prioritize since hopefully they can > > be sent during v4.17-rc* releases, I will queue the rest for the next > > merge window. > > The patches that are bug fixes are marked with a "Fixes:" tag and are > Cc'ed to stable. > > So, the following patches are fixes: > > [PATCH v4 1/6] PCI: aardvark: Fix logic in advk_pcie_{rd,wr}_conf() > [PATCH v4 2/6] PCI: aardvark: Set PIO_ADDR_LS correctly in advk_pcie_rd_conf() > [PATCH v4 3/6] PCI: aardvark: Use ISR1 instead of ISR0 interrupt in legacy irq mode > [PATCH v4 4/6] PCI: aardvark: Fix PCIe Max Read Request Size setting > > The following patches are improvements: > > [PATCH v4 5/6] PCI: aardvark: Introduce an advk_pcie_valid_device() helper > [PATCH v4 6/6] PCI: aardvark: Remove PCIe outbound window configuration I added those four patches to my pci/host/fixes branch, please have a look if they meet your expectations and if so I will ask Bjorn to send them if he thinks they are fit for -rc*. Thanks, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:02:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/6] PCI: aardvark: misc fixes and improvements In-Reply-To: <20180409205433.4eb78a45@windsurf> References: <20180406145536.19637-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20180409162356.GB14533@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> <20180409205433.4eb78a45@windsurf> Message-ID: <20180418130230.GB22463@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:54:33PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello Lorenzo, > > Thanks for your feedback! > > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:23:56 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > it is not just improvements, these look like significant bug fixes too. > > > > Let me know which patches we should prioritize since hopefully they can > > be sent during v4.17-rc* releases, I will queue the rest for the next > > merge window. > > The patches that are bug fixes are marked with a "Fixes:" tag and are > Cc'ed to stable. > > So, the following patches are fixes: > > [PATCH v4 1/6] PCI: aardvark: Fix logic in advk_pcie_{rd,wr}_conf() > [PATCH v4 2/6] PCI: aardvark: Set PIO_ADDR_LS correctly in advk_pcie_rd_conf() > [PATCH v4 3/6] PCI: aardvark: Use ISR1 instead of ISR0 interrupt in legacy irq mode > [PATCH v4 4/6] PCI: aardvark: Fix PCIe Max Read Request Size setting > > The following patches are improvements: > > [PATCH v4 5/6] PCI: aardvark: Introduce an advk_pcie_valid_device() helper > [PATCH v4 6/6] PCI: aardvark: Remove PCIe outbound window configuration I added those four patches to my pci/host/fixes branch, please have a look if they meet your expectations and if so I will ask Bjorn to send them if he thinks they are fit for -rc*. Thanks, Lorenzo