From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event
 handling code to use the failover framework
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:47:53 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20180420.114753.508240232662001454.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1524188524-28411-5-git-send-email-sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
        <20180420082802.6ca37e4c@xeon-e3>
        <20180420183505-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, kubakici@wp.pl, jasowang@redhat.com,
        loseweigh@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us
To: mst@redhat.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:45472 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1755397AbeDTPrz (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:47:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180420183505-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:43:54 +0300

> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 08:28:02AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> Plus, DPDK is now dependent on existing model.
> 
> DPDK does the kernel bypass thing, doesn't it? Why does the kernel care?

+1