From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932363AbeDWSzg (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:55:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:44287 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932172AbeDWSze (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:55:34 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48zaeAtoU4i9fw4NDyUIZbwboTfmx5DbYzNBsiE1CezycE4EKnXFGDGfpha2T88amM2CFKktg== Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:55:30 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko Cc: Juergen Gross , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lyan@suse.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, andrii_chepurnyi@epam.com, Oleksandr Andrushchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: xen-kbdfront - allow better run-time configuration Message-ID: <20180423185530.GC66646@dtor-ws> References: <20180419133934.31306-1-andr2000@gmail.com> <998533bb-8042-b07e-cb79-661750e035d9@gmail.com> <7b4c1f8a-6317-1f17-5950-64a1b7183dba@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7b4c1f8a-6317-1f17-5950-64a1b7183dba@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:29:45AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 04/23/2018 11:23 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > > On 23/04/18 10:02, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > > > Juergen, Jason, Dmitry > > > any comment on this? > > Oleksandr, please give us some time. I can't speak for others, but I am > > not sitting here idling and hoping that some work (e.g. patches to > > review) might appear. > > > > I have a lot of other stuff to do and will respond when I find some time > > to look at your patches. > > > > Pinging others on Monday when having sent out the patch only on Thursday > > is rather unfriendly. > Really sorry about this, my bad. > I had an impression that the only change we need to > discuss was uint -> bool change which seemed rather trivial I am sorry I did not respond to the previous version until today, but I do not think that we should be extending module parameters for this. Protocol features are already there for absolute pointers and multi-touch, keyboard and relative pointers should use the same mechanism. Thanks. -- Dmitry