All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Kyle Spiers <ksspiers@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rave-sp: Remove VLA
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 06:43:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424054315.2yjpnht5pu62i54q@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423200255.154645-1-ksspiers@google.com>

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Kyle Spiers wrote:

> As part of the effort to remove VLAs from the kernel[1], this creates
> constants for the checksum lengths of CCITT and 8B2C and changes
> crc_calculated to be the maximum size of a checksum.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Spiers <ksspiers@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c b/drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c
> index 5c858e784a89..99fa482419f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rave-sp.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,9 @@
>  #define RAVE_SP_DLE			0x10
>  
>  #define RAVE_SP_MAX_DATA_SIZE		64
> -#define RAVE_SP_CHECKSUM_SIZE		2  /* Worst case scenario on RDU2 */
> +#define RAVE_SP_CHECKSUM_8B2C		1
> +#define RAVE_SP_CHECKSUM_CCITT		2
> +#define RAVE_SP_CHECKSUM_SIZE		RAVE_SP_CHECKSUM_CCITT
>  /*
>   * We don't store STX, ETX and unescaped bytes, so Rx is only
>   * DATA + CSUM
> @@ -415,7 +417,12 @@ static void rave_sp_receive_frame(struct rave_sp *sp,
>  	const size_t payload_length  = length - checksum_length;
>  	const u8 *crc_reported       = &data[payload_length];
>  	struct device *dev           = &sp->serdev->dev;
> -	u8 crc_calculated[checksum_length];
> +	u8 crc_calculated[RAVE_SP_CHECKSUM_SIZE];
> +
> +	if (unlikely(length > sizeof(crc_calculated))) {

Forgive me if I have this wrong (it's still very early here), but this
doesn't leave any room for the payload?

    <--       length         -->
    <ck len><- payload length ->
    [CK][CK][D][A][T][A] .. [64]

It is my hope that length would always be larger than the size of the
checksum, or else there would never be any data?

Should this not be:

    if (unlikely(length > RAVE_SP_MAX_DATA_SIZE))

Nit: Adding the check is also an unrelated change, so would require a
separate patch.

> +		dev_warn(dev, "Dropping oversized frame\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	print_hex_dump(KERN_DEBUG, "rave-sp rx: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE,
>  		       16, 1, data, length, false);

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-24  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-23 20:02 [PATCH] rave-sp: Remove VLA Kyle Spiers
2018-04-23 20:08 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-24  5:43 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2018-04-24 16:07   ` Kees Cook
2018-04-25 10:31     ` Lee Jones
2018-04-25 16:51       ` Kyle Spiers
2018-04-26  7:44         ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180424054315.2yjpnht5pu62i54q@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=ksspiers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.