From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:48:38 +0200 Subject: [LTP] Ticket tracking system for LTP In-Reply-To: <20180423133840.cj5vah2xlm3urly6@xps> References: <20180409151738.GA2522@rei> <20180423133840.cj5vah2xlm3urly6@xps> Message-ID: <20180424084838.GA18678@rei> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > > * GitHub issues > > - probably the easiest solution > > - we can create a specific labels to sort these out > > - needs GitHub account which everybody has already > > - some operations could be done only by LTP project members > > I'm not sure if random users can add labels for example > > +1. It meets the requirements (except open source), and is already > established. To be successful, LTP's github probably needs more > curation. I see a lot of pull requests and issues opened for a long time > without any action. This is true of any solution, of course. Well I should be a bit more proactive there, most of the issues that stay open for long time are these where the original author lost interest in getting the changes upstream, quite a few of them could be closed with "no response" at this point. > Also, importantly, github is where the developers are (like it or not). True. There were two responses so far with two +1 for GitHub so I suppose that this is the way forward. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz