From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: subhra mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, steven.sistare@oracle.com,
dhaval.giani@oracle.com, rohit.k.jain@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: introduce per-cpu var next_cpu to track search limit
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:47:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424124712.GR4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180424004116.28151-3-subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:41:15PM -0700, subhra mazumdar wrote:
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <trace/events/sched.h>
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(int, next_cpu);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG) && defined(HAVE_JUMP_LABEL)
> /*
> @@ -6018,6 +6019,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
> struct rq *rq;
>
> rq = cpu_rq(i);
> + per_cpu(next_cpu, i) = -1;
If you leave it uninitialized it'll be 0, and we can avoid that extra
branch in the next patch, no?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-24 0:41 [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/3] Improve scheduler scalability for fast path subhra mazumdar
2018-04-24 0:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: remove select_idle_core() for scalability subhra mazumdar
2018-04-24 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-24 21:45 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-04-25 17:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-30 23:38 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-05-01 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 21:58 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-05-04 18:51 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-05-29 21:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-30 22:08 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-05-31 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-24 0:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: introduce per-cpu var next_cpu to track search limit subhra mazumdar
2018-04-24 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-04-24 22:39 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-04-24 0:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: limit cpu search and rotate search window for scalability subhra mazumdar
2018-04-24 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-24 22:43 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-04-24 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-24 22:48 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-04-24 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-25 0:10 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2018-04-25 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-25 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 2:46 ` [lkp-robot] [sched] 9824134a55: hackbench.throughput +85.7% improvement kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180424124712.GR4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rohit.k.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.