Hi,

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:33:26AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:30:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:26:33AM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:10:55PM +0100, Adam Thomson wrote:
> > > > > This patch set adds sink side support for the PPS feature introduced in the
> > > > > USB PD 3.0 specification.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The source PPS supply is represented using the Power Supply framework to provide
> > > > > access and control APIs for dealing with it's operating voltage and current,
> > > > > and switching between a standard PDO and PPS APDO operation. During standard PDO
> > > > > operation the voltage and current is read-only, but for APDO PPS these are
> > > > > writable as well to allow for control.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It should be noted that the keepalive for PPS is not handled within TCPM. The
> > > > > expectation is that the external user will be required to ensure re-requests
> > > > > occur regularly to ensure PPS remains and the source does not hard reset.
> > > > 
> > > > Sebastian, any objection from me taking this series through my USB tree?
> > > 
> > > I currently have the power-supply bits in a local branch for
> > > testing. I would like to have this in the power-supply
> > > tree, since there is at least one pending driver which could
> > > directly use the newly introduced usb_type.
> > > 
> > > I can either provide an immutable branch with a signed tag, or
> > > you can merged it and provide me an immutable branch.
> > > 
> > > If you merge it via the USB tree patch 2-4 are
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> > 
> > I've applied these to a testing branch in my usb tree, and if they
> > survive the 0-day bot, I'll move them to a branch that you can pull from
> > that will not change.
> > 
> > Oh, I had to add a follow-on patch to fix up a gcc warning that really
> > wasn't a warning, but it saves us problems of people complaining about
> > it.
> 
> All looks good now.
> 
> Here's the signed tag you can pull from, with the full information of
> all of the other USB patches that you are going to be getting here
> (sorry about that).

Thanks, merged.

-- Sebastian