From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 22:58:58 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] DEVELOPERS: concentrate on uClibc In-Reply-To: <20180428203511.GA24621@waldemar-brodkorb.de> References: <20180428203511.GA24621@waldemar-brodkorb.de> Message-ID: <20180428225858.0cd63f20@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 22:35:12 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb > --- > DEVELOPERS | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/DEVELOPERS b/DEVELOPERS > index 3a4ad60..45a8979 100644 > --- a/DEVELOPERS > +++ b/DEVELOPERS > @@ -1952,11 +1952,6 @@ N: Wade Berrier > F: package/ngrep/ > > N: Waldemar Brodkorb > -F: arch/Config.in.m68k > -F: arch/Config.in.or1k > -F: arch/Config.in.sparc > -F: package/glibc/ > -F: package/mksh/ > F: package/uclibc/ > F: package/uclibc-ng-test/ I understand the wish to concentrate on a smaller number of topics. However, who is going to take care of the m68k, sparc and OpenRISC architecture in Buildroot? I think besides you, not many people were interested by those architectures, and they cause fairly frequent issues at the toolchain level. Do you have a proposal here ? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com