From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751459AbeEBNSN (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2018 09:18:13 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:51351 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751137AbeEBNSJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2018 09:18:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 15:18:06 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Simon Horman Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Myl=C3=A8ne?= Josserand , linux@armlinux.org.uk, wens@csie.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, magnus.damm@gmail.com, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com, quentin.schulz@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/12] ARM: shmobile: Convert file to use cntvoff Message-ID: <20180502131806.5aybrfzll7wdoybv@flea> References: <20180501123131.7738-1-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180501123131.7738-13-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180502063639.qa7bzqxzrejd4kh2@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4xs6p73yn657oz5w" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180502063639.qa7bzqxzrejd4kh2@verge.net.au> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --4xs6p73yn657oz5w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Simon, On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 08:36:39AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 02:31:31PM +0200, Myl=E8ne Josserand wrote: > > Now that a common function is available for CNTVOFF's > > initialization, let's convert shmobile-apmu code to use > > this function. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Myl=E8ne Josserand > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven >=20 > Acked-by: Simon Horman For the sake of bisectability (and to ease the merge), is it ok if we take it through the sunxi (and then arm-soc) tree? Thanks! Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --4xs6p73yn657oz5w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE0VqZU19dR2zEVaqr0rTAlCFNr3QFAlrpuo0ACgkQ0rTAlCFN r3RLxRAAiejDwvQhxN6ZNXNcWXeZNjXK6qY5g0tdhuHV1m2aKLSubfFaKevK3+QD CnVkkZJDRY59PY+HIOwedNEQcuKpP/aSH6ZmuKj/oHR0F8RSGqyw8iiDZQnf+EHm PJ2x6PnNIym8Y0EWFAMDLk9LIOm0/hbXdQ4+Bvm3zoclmSJfHpwdjiYItRQqi/he jqAiG0v/nWMdGiq2UCzOTCcQYof404bga917zlGd3SUckPysAbqX8I6fv/JcO9pF je6pWHhDYPIUVUOFIRuHei15amPiVh2CoFEfGn5x6S6weso2K1jh2CxDUSHHojA6 iNIbKesq1YTpbvUThfNRVOlh0BNEkaYRKSMhMU1dLVxcwcF1VdhASf5veRw07yTL orjBadmCDOA1AUf49luDkJi7O/T+oJhF7dwIp/5sb4YzSIXCVbM/81b8V/b5lEzr McUKH8iO2Me96t3Z18FxFx3sJoajP4wtEWQaSuiKEkCYRvx7MRBUyrWbV7tC0UdG Vg+ei3bjYwB/VipVbA4+tDEwXKVKFJqeYFO9k20scgw387r1I+lIGazh9w9j2zzr 38lMJytJgl3pQs7XbUR7msZFAz0Y8AeWE8C8BwaZJL3ucj/GdHFGX6fg8KcjdHrs nTgZNKJco23MyzRSn+OSd/NcdsoyDou8NoDtPwS4eJ5vuYWgImI= =djhr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4xs6p73yn657oz5w-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 15:18:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v8 12/12] ARM: shmobile: Convert file to use cntvoff In-Reply-To: <20180502063639.qa7bzqxzrejd4kh2@verge.net.au> References: <20180501123131.7738-1-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180501123131.7738-13-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180502063639.qa7bzqxzrejd4kh2@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20180502131806.5aybrfzll7wdoybv@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Simon, On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 08:36:39AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 02:31:31PM +0200, Myl?ne Josserand wrote: > > Now that a common function is available for CNTVOFF's > > initialization, let's convert shmobile-apmu code to use > > this function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Myl?ne Josserand > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Acked-by: Simon Horman For the sake of bisectability (and to ease the merge), is it ok if we take it through the sunxi (and then arm-soc) tree? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: