[PATCH v2 5/6] drm/vc4: Support the case where the DSI device is disabled

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>]

Having a device with a status property != "okay" in the DT is a valid
use case, and we should not prevent the registration of the DRM device
when the DSI device connected to the DSI controller is disabled.

Consider the ENODEV return code as a valid result and do not expose the
DSI encoder/connector when it happens.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c
index 8aa897835118..db2f137f8b7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c
@@ -1606,8 +1606,18 @@ static int vc4_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
 
 	ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 0, 0,
 					  &panel, &dsi->bridge);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		/* If the bridge or panel pointed by dev->of_node is not
+		 * enabled, just return 0 here so that we don't prevent the DRM
+		 * dev from being registered. Of course that means the DSI
+		 * encoder won't be exposed, but that's not a problem since
+		 * nothing is connected to it.
+		 */
+		if (ret == -ENODEV)
+			return 0;
+
 		return ret;
+	}
 
 	if (panel) {
 		dsi->bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dev, panel,
@@ -1652,7 +1662,8 @@ static void vc4_dsi_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
 	struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(drm);
 	struct vc4_dsi *dsi = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
-	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+	if (dsi->bridge)
+		pm_runtime_disable(dev);
 
 	vc4_dsi_encoder_destroy(dsi->encoder);
 
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel