From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: Make sure we wait tWB before polling the STATUS reg
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 21:24:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180504192431.16661-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> (raw)
NAND chips require a bit of time to take the NAND operation into
account and set the BUSY bit in the STATUS reg. Make sure we don't poll
the STATUS reg too early in nand_soft_waitrdy().
Fixes: 8878b126df76 ("mtd: nand: add ->exec_op() implementation")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Move the ndelay() to nand_soft_waitrdy() instead of having it in the
FSMC driver
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 72f3a89da513..da94fcb4dd9b 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -706,12 +706,17 @@ static void nand_wait_status_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned long timeo)
*/
int nand_soft_waitrdy(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned long timeout_ms)
{
+ const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings;
u8 status = 0;
int ret;
if (!chip->exec_op)
return -ENOTSUPP;
+ /* Wait tWB before polling the STATUS reg. */
+ timings = nand_get_sdr_timings(&chip->data_interface);
+ ndelay(PSEC_TO_NSEC(sdr->tWB_max));
+
ret = nand_status_op(chip, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.14.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-04 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-04 19:24 Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-05-06 21:56 ` [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: Make sure we wait tWB before polling the STATUS reg Miquel Raynal
2018-05-07 9:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-05-08 21:11 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180504192431.16661-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.