All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915/execlists: Make submission tasklet hardirq safe
Date: Mon,  7 May 2018 14:57:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180507135731.10587-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180507135731.10587-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Prepare to allow the execlists submission to be run from underneath a
hardirq timer context (and not just the current softirq context) as is
required for fast preemption resets and context switches.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index f9f4064dec0e..15c373ea5b7e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -357,10 +357,13 @@ execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
 {
 	struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
 		container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->timeline.lock, flags);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
 	__unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->timeline.lock, flags);
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -554,7 +557,7 @@ static void inject_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	execlists_set_active(&engine->execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
 }
 
-static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+static bool __execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
 	struct execlist_port *port = execlists->port;
@@ -564,6 +567,8 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	struct rb_node *rb;
 	bool submit = false;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
+
 	/* Hardware submission is through 2 ports. Conceptually each port
 	 * has a (RING_START, RING_HEAD, RING_TAIL) tuple. RING_START is
 	 * static for a context, and unique to each, so we only execute
@@ -585,7 +590,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	 * and context switches) submission.
 	 */
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
 	rb = execlists->first;
 	GEM_BUG_ON(rb_first(&execlists->queue) != rb);
 
@@ -600,7 +604,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 						EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER));
 		GEM_BUG_ON(!port_count(&port[0]));
 		if (port_count(&port[0]) > 1)
-			goto unlock;
+			return false;
 
 		/*
 		 * If we write to ELSP a second time before the HW has had
@@ -610,11 +614,11 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		 * the HW to indicate that it has had a chance to respond.
 		 */
 		if (!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK))
-			goto unlock;
+			return false;
 
 		if (need_preempt(engine, last, execlists->queue_priority)) {
 			inject_preempt_context(engine);
-			goto unlock;
+			return false;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -639,7 +643,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		 * priorities of the ports haven't been switch.
 		 */
 		if (port_count(&port[1]))
-			goto unlock;
+			return false;
 
 		/*
 		 * WaIdleLiteRestore:bdw,skl
@@ -744,13 +748,25 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	/* We must always keep the beast fed if we have work piled up */
 	GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->first && !port_isset(execlists->port));
 
-unlock:
-	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
-
-	if (submit) {
+	/* Re-evaluate the executing context setup after each preemptive kick */
+	if (last)
 		execlists_user_begin(execlists, execlists->port);
+
+	return submit;
+}
+
+static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool submit;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->timeline.lock, flags);
+	submit = __execlists_dequeue(engine);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->timeline.lock, flags);
+
+	if (submit)
 		execlists_submit_ports(engine);
-	}
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(port_isset(execlists->port) &&
 		   !execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER));
-- 
2.17.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-07 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-07 13:57 [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/i915: Flush submission tasklet after bumping priority Chris Wilson
2018-05-07 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: Disable tasklet scheduling across initial scheduling Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 10:02   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 10:31     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-07 13:57 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2018-05-08 10:10   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915/execlists: Make submission tasklet hardirq safe Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 10:24     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 10:56       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 11:05         ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 11:38           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 11:43             ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 17:38   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 17:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 20:59     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-09  9:23       ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-07 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915/guc: " Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 17:43   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-07 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submit onto idle engines Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 10:23   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 10:40     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 11:00       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-07 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submission from irq handler Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 10:54   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 11:10     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-08 11:53       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 12:17   ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2018-05-07 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Speed up idle detection by kicking the tasklets Chris Wilson
2018-05-07 15:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v2,1/7] drm/i915: Flush submission tasklet after bumping priority Patchwork
2018-05-07 15:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-07 15:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-07 17:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-05-08  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08  9:45   ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-08  9:57     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-08 14:11 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v2,1/7] drm/i915: Flush submission tasklet after bumping priority (rev2) Patchwork
2018-05-08 14:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-08 14:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-08 16:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180507135731.10587-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.