[PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
in comments:

"seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---

V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	uint32_t DP;
 
 	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
-		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
+		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
 		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
 		return;
 
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	/*
 	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
 	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
-	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
+	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
 	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
 	 */
 	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
@@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
 
 	/*
-	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
+	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
 	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
 	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
 	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
-	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
+	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
 	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
 	 * from a port.
 	 */
@@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 
 	/*
 	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
-	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
+	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
 	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
 	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
 	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
@@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
 	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
 	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
-	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
+	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
 	 */
 	if (force_disable_vdd) {
 		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);
-- 
2.17.0

[PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
in comments:

"seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---

V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	uint32_t DP;
 
 	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
-		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
+		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
 		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
 		return;
 
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	/*
 	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
 	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
-	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
+	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
 	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
 	 */
 	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
@@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
 
 	/*
-	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
+	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
 	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
 	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
 	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
-	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
+	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
 	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
 	 * from a port.
 	 */
@@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 
 	/*
 	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
-	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
+	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
 	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
 	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
 	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
@@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
 	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
 	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
-	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
+	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
 	 */
 	if (force_disable_vdd) {
 		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);
-- 
2.17.0

[PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
in comments:

"seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---

V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	uint32_t DP;
 
 	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
-		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
+		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
 		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
 		return;
 
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	/*
 	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
 	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
-	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
+	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
 	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
 	 */
 	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
@@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
 
 	/*
-	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
+	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
 	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
 	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
 	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
-	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
+	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
 	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
 	 * from a port.
 	 */
@@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 
 	/*
 	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
-	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
+	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
 	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
 	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
 	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
@@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
 	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
 	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
-	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
+	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
 	 */
 	if (force_disable_vdd) {
 		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);
-- 
2.17.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42937/
State : success

== Summary ==

= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4162 -> Patchwork_8960 =

== Summary - WARNING ==

  Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_8960 need to be verified
  manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_8960, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/42937/revisions/1/mbox/

== Possible new issues ==

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_8960:

  === IGT changes ===

    ==== Warnings ====

    igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic:
      fi-pnv-d510:        PASS -> SKIP

    
== Known issues ==

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_8960 that come from known issues:

  === IGT changes ===

    ==== Issues hit ====

    igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
      fi-hsw-4770r:       PASS -> FAIL (fdo#100368)

    igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
      fi-bxt-dsi:         PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103927)

    
    ==== Possible fixes ====

    igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic-small-bo-tiledx:
      fi-gdg-551:         FAIL (fdo#102575) -> PASS

    
  fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
  fdo#102575 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
  fdo#103927 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927


== Participating hosts (41 -> 37) ==

  Missing    (4): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-ilk-m540 fi-byt-squawks fi-skl-6700hq 


== Build changes ==

    * Linux: CI_DRM_4162 -> Patchwork_8960

  CI_DRM_4162: ea17aab5ec734a262a252758d7412c09dfa833cc @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_4468: 548a894dc904c4628522dbbc77cb179a4c965ebc @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_8960: f76a6f37217db32642e478c43004bae5e030436d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4468: 1e60f1499e5b71b6d5a747189d7c28f57359a87f @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit


== Linux commits ==

f76a6f37217d drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_8960/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 09 May 2018, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
> in comments:
>
> "seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

(Waiting for the CI runs before merging.)

> ---
>
> V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments
>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	uint32_t DP;
>  
>  	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
> -		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
> +		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>  		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	/*
>  	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
>  	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
> -	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
> +	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
>  	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
>  	 */
>  	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
> @@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
> +	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
>  	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
>  	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
>  	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
> -	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
> +	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
>  	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
>  	 * from a port.
>  	 */
> @@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
> -	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
> +	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
>  	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
>  	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
>  	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
> @@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
>  	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
>  	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
> -	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
> +	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
>  	 */
>  	if (force_disable_vdd) {
>  		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 09 May 2018, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
> in comments:
>
> "seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

(Waiting for the CI runs before merging.)

> ---
>
> V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments
>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	uint32_t DP;
>  
>  	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
> -		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
> +		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>  		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	/*
>  	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
>  	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
> -	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
> +	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
>  	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
>  	 */
>  	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
> @@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
> +	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
>  	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
>  	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
>  	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
> -	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
> +	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
>  	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
>  	 * from a port.
>  	 */
> @@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
> -	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
> +	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
>  	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
>  	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
>  	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
> @@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
>  	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
>  	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
> -	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
> +	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
>  	 */
>  	if (force_disable_vdd) {
>  		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 09 May 2018, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
> in comments:
>
> "seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

(Waiting for the CI runs before merging.)

> ---
>
> V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments
>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	uint32_t DP;
>  
>  	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
> -		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
> +		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>  		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	/*
>  	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
>  	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
> -	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
> +	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
>  	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
>  	 */
>  	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
> @@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
> +	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
>  	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
>  	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
>  	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
> -	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
> +	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
>  	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
>  	 * from a port.
>  	 */
> @@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
> -	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
> +	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
>  	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
>  	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
>  	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
> @@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
>  	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
>  	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
> -	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
> +	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
>  	 */
>  	if (force_disable_vdd) {
>  		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42937/
State : success

== Summary ==

= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4162_full -> Patchwork_8960_full =

== Summary - WARNING ==

  Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_8960_full need to be verified
  manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_8960_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/42937/revisions/1/mbox/

== Possible new issues ==

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_8960_full:

  === IGT changes ===

    ==== Warnings ====

    igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt:
      shard-kbl:          PASS -> SKIP +1

    igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd2:
      shard-kbl:          SKIP -> PASS

    igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursorb-vs-flipb-toggle:
      shard-hsw:          PASS -> SKIP +1

    igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-query-idle:
      shard-snb:          PASS -> SKIP

    
== Known issues ==

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_8960_full that come from known issues:

  === IGT changes ===

    ==== Issues hit ====

    igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race:
      shard-glk:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103060)

    igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible:
      shard-hsw:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103928)

    igt@kms_flip@wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible:
      shard-glk:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#100368)

    igt@kms_setmode@basic:
      shard-hsw:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#99912)
      shard-kbl:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#99912)

    
    ==== Possible fixes ====

    igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-flip-vs-cursor-atomic:
      shard-hsw:          FAIL (fdo#104873) -> PASS

    igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible:
      shard-glk:          FAIL (fdo#100368) -> PASS +1

    igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing:
      shard-apl:          WARN (fdo#100047) -> PASS

    igt@perf@blocking:
      shard-hsw:          FAIL (fdo#102252) -> PASS +1

    
  fdo#100047 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100047
  fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
  fdo#102252 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102252
  fdo#103060 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103060
  fdo#103928 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103928
  fdo#104873 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104873
  fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912


== Participating hosts (9 -> 9) ==

  No changes in participating hosts


== Build changes ==

    * Linux: CI_DRM_4162 -> Patchwork_8960

  CI_DRM_4162: ea17aab5ec734a262a252758d7412c09dfa833cc @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_4468: 548a894dc904c4628522dbbc77cb179a4c965ebc @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_8960: f76a6f37217db32642e478c43004bae5e030436d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4468: 1e60f1499e5b71b6d5a747189d7c28f57359a87f @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_8960/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 09 May 2018, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2018, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
>> in comments:
>>
>> "seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> (Waiting for the CI runs before merging.)

And pushed to dinq, thanks for the patch.

BR,
Jani.

>
>> ---
>>
>> V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	uint32_t DP;
>>  
>>  	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
>> -		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>> +		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>>  		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
>>  		return;
>>  
>> @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
>>  	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
>> -	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
>> +	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
>>  	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
>>  	 */
>>  	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
>> @@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>>  
>>  	/*
>> -	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
>> +	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
>>  	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
>>  	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
>>  	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
>> -	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
>> +	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
>>  	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
>>  	 * from a port.
>>  	 */
>> @@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
>> -	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
>> +	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
>>  	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
>>  	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
>>  	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
>> @@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
>>  	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
>>  	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
>> -	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
>> +	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (force_disable_vdd) {
>>  		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 09 May 2018, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2018, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
>> in comments:
>>
>> "seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> (Waiting for the CI runs before merging.)

And pushed to dinq, thanks for the patch.

BR,
Jani.

>
>> ---
>>
>> V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	uint32_t DP;
>>  
>>  	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
>> -		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>> +		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>>  		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
>>  		return;
>>  
>> @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
>>  	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
>> -	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
>> +	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
>>  	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
>>  	 */
>>  	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
>> @@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>>  
>>  	/*
>> -	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
>> +	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
>>  	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
>>  	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
>>  	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
>> -	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
>> +	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
>>  	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
>>  	 * from a port.
>>  	 */
>> @@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
>> -	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
>> +	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
>>  	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
>>  	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
>>  	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
>> @@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
>>  	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
>>  	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
>> -	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
>> +	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (force_disable_vdd) {
>>  		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [PATCH][V2] drm/i915/dp: fix spelling mistakes: "seqeuncer" and "seqeuencer"

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 09 May 2018, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2018, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> Trivial fix to spelling mistakes in WARN warning message text and
>> in comments:
>>
>> "seqeuncer", "seqeuencer" -> "sequencer"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> (Waiting for the CI runs before merging.)

And pushed to dinq, thanks for the patch.

BR,
Jani.

>
>> ---
>>
>> V2: Also fix seqeuencer in comments
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index dde92e4af5d3..2cc58596ff5a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	uint32_t DP;
>>  
>>  	if (WARN(I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN,
>> -		 "skipping pipe %c power seqeuncer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>> +		 "skipping pipe %c power sequencer kick due to port %c being active\n",
>>  		 pipe_name(pipe), port_name(intel_dig_port->base.port)))
>>  		return;
>>  
>> @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ vlv_power_sequencer_kick(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Similar magic as in intel_dp_enable_port().
>>  	 * We _must_ do this port enable + disable trick
>> -	 * to make this power seqeuencer lock onto the port.
>> +	 * to make this power sequencer lock onto the port.
>>  	 * Otherwise even VDD force bit won't work.
>>  	 */
>>  	I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, DP);
>> @@ -3066,11 +3066,11 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  	edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>>  
>>  	/*
>> -	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power seqeuencers
>> +	 * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
>>  	 * have the same port selected (even if only one has power/vdd
>>  	 * enabled). The failure manifests as vlv_wait_port_ready() failing
>>  	 * CHV on the other hand doesn't seem to mind having the same port
>> -	 * selected in multiple power seqeuencers, but let's clear the
>> +	 * selected in multiple power sequencers, but let's clear the
>>  	 * port select always when logically disconnecting a power sequencer
>>  	 * from a port.
>>  	 */
>> @@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * On some VLV machines the BIOS can leave the VDD
>> -	 * enabled even on power seqeuencers which aren't
>> +	 * enabled even on power sequencers which aren't
>>  	 * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
>>  	 * power domain tracking the first time we pick
>>  	 * one of these power sequencers for use since
>> @@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  	 * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
>>  	 * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
>>  	 * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
>> -	 * soon as the new power seqeuencer gets initialized.
>> +	 * soon as the new power sequencer gets initialized.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (force_disable_vdd) {
>>  		u32 pp = ironlake_get_pp_control(intel_dp);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx