From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497371F424 for ; Wed, 9 May 2018 17:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935125AbeEIRyu (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2018 13:54:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:33124 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934331AbeEIRys (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2018 13:54:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f67.google.com with SMTP id i194-v6so23005744pgd.0 for ; Wed, 09 May 2018 10:54:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=HDWpiFVIE0Cd7KeuOQjBubUeP6MbUUeox+AK5NChGxM=; b=TYxDvOn7vrut0Cgd4ifnRxjecZpvy+kiwaE4ZW1kwcbplUySUdebCP7cGl7GzdamNU plxDRlLAYJuCbE/Sungac9nvhpErq/oln9A5yncUakcqM+T3esa/4B8GYO72li07BjrJ bkowXMBIfX125ssa8FOYD0uw62+I9D1Rl7R2VmhboRPqi82UExypsEahIFVmIkNH1Ur3 1RBXVM2lI3xvC7X5+vXjFA0fnfRZ6WiYqBgELBjFpHD6zM+WMLtUFklpQzJPc+WLDbZu rVu6vhhCc7cimitAyRMtoRkEIWRKdqyT8MToXIUgybhk/8R5gy235UyxOJ8F7Z7y0rDC /0+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HDWpiFVIE0Cd7KeuOQjBubUeP6MbUUeox+AK5NChGxM=; b=k5t4FEt6P4Ha0l57+iPjpl7/CR5PAekMY+/4dNdfr7yTNsWY3tjg06rtABUCWP68mk D8J1wnkV2niOcdXoxvyr2q8zoGcDURgrxfXKr+jc+Y8ppQXrPAWxPHwopSm17TUgXGHx RegiexJWihCh1oQG/sxkYF66zHMNTULYPu7AunezCiwxX10uK92MEgQgHbrdSLfqBkJY CDL24O4nLfG/HPF3eSxsznSqlIxkZklfH4G1T0ppsaQ3LaCLUxiG40DehSfNQPgFp4m1 mIar0wXtX4uMk8aaaBUSzw+/toxkJy2K26zwLQpZ47jjgHvR/FYChGYWgFwKBj4ewjBH i86w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBx9LdTElqw8nuPJQfXHggu1VwOYbrO0AN5/C8gr2+y5D6fTqXl 8R1h6ZLfGRYuXvllUSi18edyzRdN X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZprI1iZLq/wPcnYOKL+k5hKgno+GBzrQVlTz1+oDiQXZBfzwlkT4C4YSqEon+GCbjRA1pYYWw== X-Received: by 10.98.33.28 with SMTP id h28mr43638776pfh.249.1525888488247; Wed, 09 May 2018 10:54:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aiede.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:0:100e:422:4187:1d6c:d3d6:9ce6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x124sm1827765pfx.72.2018.05.09.10.54.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 May 2018 10:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:54:45 -0700 From: Jonathan Nieder To: Carlos =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn?= Nieto Cc: Christian Couder , git , =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0?= Bjarmason , Junio C Hamano , Stefan Beller , Jonathan Tan , ethomson@edwardthomson.com, ps@pks.im Subject: Re: Implementing reftable in Git Message-ID: <20180509175445.GK10348@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> References: <20180509164807.GI10348@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> <67fd1816c4da0e54fb88dc29a44b897d41a36602.camel@dwim.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <67fd1816c4da0e54fb88dc29a44b897d41a36602.camel@dwim.me> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Carlos Martín Nieto wrote: > On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 09:48 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> If you would like the patches at https://git.eclipse.org/r/q/topic:reftable >> relicensed for Git's use so that you don't need to include that >> license header, let me know. Separate from any legal concerns, if >> you're doing a straight port, a one-line comment crediting the JGit >> project would still be appreciated, of course. [...] > Would you expect that this port would keep the Eclipse Distribution > License or would it get relicensed to GPLv2? I think you're way overcomplicating things. The patches are copyright Google. We can handle issues as they come. Jonathan