From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965931AbeEJOWw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2018 10:22:52 -0400 Received: from gum.cmpxchg.org ([85.214.110.215]:50242 "EHLO gum.cmpxchg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965078AbeEJOWv (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2018 10:22:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 10:24:42 -0400 From: Johannes Weiner To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Balbir Singh , Mike Galbraith , Oliver Yang , Shakeel Butt , xxx xxx , Taras Kondratiuk , Daniel Walker , Vinayak Menon , Ruslan Ruslichenko , kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] psi: pressure stall information for CPU, memory, and IO Message-ID: <20180510142442.GG19348@cmpxchg.org> References: <20180507210135.1823-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <20180507210135.1823-7-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <20180509102100.GN12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180509102100.GN12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:21:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:01:34PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > + local_irq_disable(); > > + rq = this_rq(); > > + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); > > + rq_pin_lock(rq, &rf); > > Given that churn in sched.h, you seen rq_lock() and friends. > > Either write this like: > > local_irq_disable(); > rq = this_rq(); > rq_lock(rq, &rf); > > Or instroduce "rq = this_rq_lock_irq()", which we could also use in > do_sched_yield(). Sounds good, I'll add that. > > + update_rq_clock(rq); > > + > > + current->flags |= PF_MEMSTALL; > > + psi_task_change(current, rq_clock(rq), 0, TSK_MEMSTALL); > > + > > + rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); > > + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); > > + local_irq_enable(); > > That's called rq_unlock_irq(). I'll use that. This code was first written against a kernel that didn't have 8a8c69c32778 ("sched/core: Add rq->lock wrappers.") yet ;)