From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sched: cls: enable verbose logging Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 16:40:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20180514.164001.801268954328880578.davem@davemloft.net> References: <763cd60ed7addf605daf8b77c8639c5c08ada219.1526243501.git.marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kubakici@wp.pl, dsahern@gmail.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, jiri@resnulli.us, aring@mojatatu.com, jhs@mojatatu.com To: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:41652 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751498AbeENUkE (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 16:40:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Cong Wang Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:30:53 -0700 > I fail to understand why you need a flag here, IOW, why not just pass > extack unconditionally? It will confuse users, so isn't passed up by default.