From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752458AbeENIhH (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 04:37:07 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:34424 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752155AbeENIhE (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 04:37:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:37:03 +0200 From: Antoine Tenart To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Antoine Tenart , davem@davemloft.net, kishon@ti.com, gregory.clement@bootlin.com, andrew@lunn.ch, jason@lakedaemon.net, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, nadavh@marvell.com, stefanc@marvell.com, ymarkman@marvell.com, mw@semihalf.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] phy: add 2.5G SGMII mode to the phy_mode enum Message-ID: <20180514083703.GG24660@kwain> References: <20180504135643.23466-1-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20180504135643.23466-7-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20180508123408.GK16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180508123408.GK16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Russell, On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:34:08PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:56:36PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > This patch adds one more generic PHY mode to the phy_mode enum, to allow > > configuring generic PHYs to the 2.5G SGMII mode by using the set_mode > > callback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart > > Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I > > Would it be possible to get the 2.5G SGMII comphy support merged > ahead of the rest of this series please - I don't think there's been > any objections to it, and having it in mainline would then mean I can > drop the Marvell Comphy code from my tree and transition to the bootlin > Comphy code instead. > > Of course, the perfect solution would be to get the whole series merged, > but I'm just thinking about the situation where we're still discussing > points when the next merge window opens. That would be great, and there are no dependency issue if patches 6 and 7 are taken ahead. Kishon: since there are no objection to these two phy patches, could you take them? Thanks! Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: antoine.tenart@bootlin.com (Antoine Tenart) Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:37:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] phy: add 2.5G SGMII mode to the phy_mode enum In-Reply-To: <20180508123408.GK16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20180504135643.23466-1-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20180504135643.23466-7-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20180508123408.GK16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20180514083703.GG24660@kwain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Russell, On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:34:08PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:56:36PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > This patch adds one more generic PHY mode to the phy_mode enum, to allow > > configuring generic PHYs to the 2.5G SGMII mode by using the set_mode > > callback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart > > Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I > > Would it be possible to get the 2.5G SGMII comphy support merged > ahead of the rest of this series please - I don't think there's been > any objections to it, and having it in mainline would then mean I can > drop the Marvell Comphy code from my tree and transition to the bootlin > Comphy code instead. > > Of course, the perfect solution would be to get the whole series merged, > but I'm just thinking about the situation where we're still discussing > points when the next merge window opens. That would be great, and there are no dependency issue if patches 6 and 7 are taken ahead. Kishon: since there are no objection to these two phy patches, could you take them? Thanks! Antoine -- Antoine T?nart, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com