From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: inode: Don't compress if NODATASUM or NODATACOW set
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 14:39:33 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514143933.60b3bb76@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea90a7da-a055-6879-e64f-f0f3bca81a23@suse.com>
On Mon, 14 May 2018 11:36:26 +0300
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> wrote:
> So what made you have these expectation, is it codified somewhere
> (docs/man pages etc)? I'm fine with that semantics IF this is what
> people expect.
"Compression ...does not work for NOCOW files":
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Compression
The mount options man page does not say that the NOCOW attribute of files will
be disregarded with compress-force. It only mentions interaction with the
nodatacow and nodatasum mount options. So I'd expect the attribute to still
work and prevent compression of NOCOW files.
> Now the question is why people grew up to have this expectation and not the
> other way round? IMO force_compress should really disregard everything else
Both are knobs that the user needs to explicitly set, the difference is that
the +C attribute is fine-grained and the mount option is global. If they are
set by the user to conflicting values, it seems more useful to have the
fine-grained control override the global one, not the other way round.
--
With respect,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-14 7:02 [PATCH] btrfs: inode: Don't compress if NODATASUM or NODATACOW set Qu Wenruo
2018-05-14 8:10 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-14 8:20 ` Roman Mamedov
2018-05-14 8:36 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-14 9:31 ` james harvey
2018-05-14 9:39 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2018-05-14 9:46 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-14 16:49 ` David Sterba
2018-05-14 9:30 ` james harvey
2018-05-14 10:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-05-14 22:24 ` james harvey
2018-05-15 0:15 ` james harvey
2018-05-14 8:24 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-05-14 16:52 ` David Sterba
2018-05-14 20:46 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-05-15 18:18 ` David Sterba
2018-05-14 22:29 ` james harvey
2018-05-15 1:35 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180514143933.60b3bb76@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.