From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/ring_buffer: ensure atomicity and order of updates
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 17:24:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514152428.GS12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514152022.z3hnkkj3rbcabtyy@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:20:23PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > @@ -10499,6 +10523,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
> > goto err_cred;
> > }
> >
> > + if (in_compat_syscall())
> > + event->event_caps |= PERF_EV_CAP_COMPAT;
> > +
>
> After a native perf_event_open, you could pass the fd (or exec) to
> another task that was compat (or vice-versa), so this wouldn't work in
> that case (crazy as it may be).
>
> I don't have a better suggestion at present, though.
As discussed on IRC, we could trigger off of the buffer size; if the
buffer is <4G the &= UINT_MAX is harmless, if the buffer is larger, you
have to be using a 64bit thingy anyway.
Flipping the overflow functions around on attach/detach to buffers is a
little more dodgy, but could be done I suppose.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 13:06 [PATCH] perf/ring_buffer: ensure atomicity and order of updates Mark Rutland
2018-05-11 1:19 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-11 1:19 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-11 10:59 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-11 16:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-14 11:05 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-14 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-14 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-14 15:20 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-14 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-23 16:42 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180514152428.GS12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.