All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	byungchul.park@lge.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:00:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514180027.GC26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514031541.67247-6-joel@joelfernandes.org>

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:15:38PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> The funnel locking loop in rcu_start_this_gp uses rcu_root as a
> temporary variable while walking the combining tree. This causes a
> tiresome exercise of a code reader reminding themselves that rcu_root
> may not be root. Lets just call it rcu_node, and then finally when
> rcu_node is the rcu_root, lets assign it at that time.
> 
> Just a clean up patch, no logical change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

I agree that my names could use some improvement, but given that you
called it rnp_node in the patch and rcu_node in the commit log, I would
argue that rnp_node has a Hamming-distance problem.  ;-)

How about rnp_start for the formal parameter, rnp for the cursor running
up the tree, and retaining rnp_root for the root?

I considered and rejected the thought of rnp_leaf for the formal
parameter because this function is not necessarily called with a leaf
rcu_node structure.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 9f5679ba413b..40670047d22c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
>  {
>  	bool ret = false;
>  	struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
> -	struct rcu_node *rnp_root;
> +	struct rcu_node *rnp_node, *rnp_root = NULL;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Use funnel locking to either acquire the root rcu_node
> @@ -1581,24 +1581,26 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
>  	 */
>  	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
>  	trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_start, TPS("Startleaf"));
> -	for (rnp_root = rnp; 1; rnp_root = rnp_root->parent) {
> -		if (rnp_root != rnp)
> -			raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
> -		if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_start) ||
> -		    rcu_seq_done(&rnp_root->gp_seq, gp_seq_start) ||
> -		    (rnp != rnp_root &&
> -		     rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp_root->gp_seq)))) {
> -			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_root, rdp, gp_seq_start,
> +	for (rnp_node = rnp; 1; rnp_node = rnp_node->parent) {
> +		if (rnp_node != rnp)
> +			raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_node);
> +		if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_node->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_start) ||
> +		    rcu_seq_done(&rnp_node->gp_seq, gp_seq_start) ||
> +		    (rnp != rnp_node &&
> +		     rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp_node->gp_seq)))) {
> +			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_node, rdp, gp_seq_start,
>  					  TPS("Prestarted"));
>  			goto unlock_out;
>  		}
> -		rnp_root->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
> +		rnp_node->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
>  		if (rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)))
>  			goto unlock_out;
> -		if (rnp_root != rnp && rnp_root->parent != NULL)
> -			raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
> -		if (!rnp_root->parent)
> +		if (rnp_node != rnp && rnp_node->parent != NULL)
> +			raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_node);
> +		if (!rnp_node->parent) {
> +			rnp_root = rnp_node;
>  			break;  /* At root, and perhaps also leaf. */
> +		}
>  	}
> 
>  	/* If GP already in progress, just leave, otherwise start one. */
> @@ -1616,10 +1618,10 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
>  	trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_seq), TPS("newreq"));
>  	ret = true;  /* Caller must wake GP kthread. */
>  unlock_out:
> -	if (rnp != rnp_root)
> -		raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
> +	if (rnp != rnp_node)
> +		raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_node);
>  	/* Push furthest requested GP to leaf node and rcu_data structure. */
> -	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_start)) {
> +	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_node->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_start)) {
>  		rnp->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
>  		rdp->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_start;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14  3:15 [PATCH RFC 0/8] rcu fixes, clean ups for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14  3:47   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-14  5:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 17:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:51     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  7:02         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 12:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 18:41             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15 19:08               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 22:55                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:45                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:21                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 14:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-14 17:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:35       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:42         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] rcu: Add back the cpuend tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] rcu: Get rid of old c variable from places in tree RCU Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 17:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:41     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] rcu: Use rcu_node as temporary variable in funnel locking loop Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:00   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-05-15  0:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] rcu: Add back the Startedleaf tracepoint Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 18:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  0:57     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:46       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 23:04         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-16 15:48           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-16 23:13             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] rcu: trace CleanupMore condition only if needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 19:20   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:01     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-15  3:47       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14  3:15 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] rcu: Fix cpustart tracepoint gp_seq number Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-05-14 20:33   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15  1:02     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180514180027.GC26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.