From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@apporbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace
 use cases
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 15:21:04 +1000
Message-ID: <20180515052104.GA10152@eros>
References: <20180515025112.16647-1-dsahern@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz,
        idosch@mellanox.com, sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com,
        roopa@cumulusnetworks.com
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:59249 "EHLO
        out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752292AbeEOFVJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 15 May 2018 01:21:09 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180515025112.16647-1-dsahern@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Hi David,

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 07:51:05PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> This patch set fixes a few append and replace uses cases for IPv6 and
> adds test cases that codifies the expectations of how append and replace
> are expected to work.

Nood question: what commit does this apply on top of please.  I
attempted to apply the set on top of net-next

	commit (961423f9fcbc Merge branch 'sctp-Introduce-sctp_flush_ctx')

patch 4 and 5 have merge conflicts (I stopped at 5).

thanks,
Tobin.