From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:22453 "EHLO ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017AbeEQWDW (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2018 18:03:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 08:02:55 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mkfs: distinguish between struct sb_feat_args and struct cli_params Message-ID: <20180517220255.GB23861@dastard> References: <20180517192700.23457-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20180517192700.23457-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180517192700.23457-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com, jack@suse.com, jeffm@suse.com, okurz@suse.com, lpechacek@suse.com, jtulak@redhat.com On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:26:56PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > The struct sb_feat_args will actually be shared between the code which > processes command line options and the configuration file, as such we > need to clarify and reflect this clearly in documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez Sensible. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com