From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457B91C004D for ; Sun, 20 May 2018 13:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425A422925 for ; Sun, 20 May 2018 13:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KejnH2+MULs6 for ; Sun, 20 May 2018 13:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com (mail-wr0-f194.google.com [209.85.128.194]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57662227A9 for ; Sun, 20 May 2018 13:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f194.google.com with SMTP id i12-v6so240982wrc.4 for ; Sun, 20 May 2018 06:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 15:01:43 +0200 From: Sergio Paracuellos Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: mt7621-gpio: retrieve correct pointers in interrupt related functions Message-ID: <20180520130143.GA21293@foobar> References: <87tvr31d19.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <1526803562-8369-1-git-send-email-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> <87d0xq1wmz.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20180520101823.GA10002@foobar> <20180520123809.GA10031@kroah.com> <20180520123914.GA10047@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180520123914.GA10047@kroah.com> List-Id: Linux Driver Project Developer List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: Greg KH Cc: NeilBrown , driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 02:38:09PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:53:08PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 20 2018, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > > > > > > > The data passed between irq related functions and the ones which have > > > > > been retrieved where different. Also first data haven't properly > > > > > set on irq_domain_add_linear call where it was passing NULL instead. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: NeilBrown > > > > Tested-by: NeilBrown > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > NeilBrown > > > > > > Thanks, Neil. > > > > > > So I'll send v5 of this series to make things easier. > > > I'll join this PATCH with PATCH 5 and make TODO file > > > empty. > > > > > > Ugh, I'm totally confused now. What is the "correct" patch series to > > consider for merging here? v5? Something else? > > Actually to make it easier on my side (which I need to optimize for due > to the heavy patch load), I've dropped all of your patches in my queue. > Please resend whatever I have not yet applied that is ready to be > considered for merging. > > thanks, I have just resent v5 as you are point out here. > > greg k-h Best regards, Sergio Paracuellos _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel