From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C181F51C for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 19:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751127AbeEUTlW (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 15:41:22 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:48256 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751050AbeEUTlW (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 15:41:22 -0400 Received: (qmail 28053 invoked by uid 109); 21 May 2018 19:41:22 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Mon, 21 May 2018 19:41:22 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 31223 invoked by uid 111); 21 May 2018 19:41:30 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP; Mon, 21 May 2018 15:41:30 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 21 May 2018 15:41:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 15:41:20 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Stefan Beller Cc: git Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] http: use strbufs instead of fixed buffers Message-ID: <20180521194120.GA9742@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20180519015444.GA12080@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180519015636.GA32492@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:11:51AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Jeff King wrote: > > > @@ -2421,4 +2426,5 @@ void release_http_object_request(struct http_object_request *freq) > .. > > + strbuf_release(&freq->tmpfile); > > Do we need an equivalent in release_http_pack_request as well? Yes, but isn't there one? >From the original patch: --- a/http.c +++ b/http.c @@ -2082,6 +2082,7 @@ void release_http_pack_request(struct http_pack_request *preq) preq->packfile = NULL; } preq->slot = NULL; + strbuf_release(&preq->tmpfile); free(preq->url); free(preq); } Or am I missing something? -Peff