From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fKqiG-00075E-Sv for speck@linutronix.de; Mon, 21 May 2018 21:43:21 +0200 Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 21:42:55 +0200 From: Greg KH Subject: [MODERATED] Re: Date/Time? Message-ID: <20180521194255.GA13975@kroah.com> References: <20180519172627.GB1239@kroah.com> <20180521164655.GI17976@kroah.com> <20180521171240.GD14838@char.us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180521171240.GD14838@char.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 01:12:40PM -0400, speck for Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > They also complained that they can not finalize their patches as they do > > not know what we agreed on for the prctl() interface. Which sucks as > > that was hashed out here weeks ago. > > They weren't on keybase? I've religiously been telling folks what is done > upstream along with the patches so that this would _not_ occur! > > This is on the 'spectre_meltdown' keybase channel. Before an hour ago, I didn't know what "keybase" was. Now that I do know, I have no idea how in the world anyone submitted kernel patches using it for ARM people to be basing their code on. Come on people, be sane here. The ARM developers said they only got the patches through a back-channel, which sounds like what the keybase chat was. But it wasn't good enough and I don't blame them. ugh. Oh well, good thing that no one cares about ARM servers :( thanks, greg k-h