From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <SRS0=nia/=II=linuxfoundation.org=gregkh@kernel.org>
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99])
	by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <SRS0=nia/=II=linuxfoundation.org=gregkh@kernel.org>)
	id 1fKrem-0007ri-48
	for speck@linutronix.de; Mon, 21 May 2018 22:43:48 +0200
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 22:43:24 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [MODERATED] Re: Date/Time?
Message-ID: <20180521204324.GB24535@kroah.com>
References: <20180519172627.GB1239@kroah.com>
 <ab610f46-9e42-a9f6-5a79-65be1f3dc552@redhat.com>
 <20180521164655.GI17976@kroah.com>
 <0d7325d3-7882-7f24-a4e1-2df1259adaca@redhat.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805212054520.1599@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <abac87bd-e90e-4f7b-4962-b624c7bc4251@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <abac87bd-e90e-4f7b-4962-b624c7bc4251@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: speck@linutronix.de
List-ID: <speck.linutronix.de>

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 03:16:56PM -0400, speck for Jon Masters wrote:
> 
> This is why we need a better framework (and some folks are working on
> something) for joint industry issues that removes single vendors from
> owning architectural embargoes that impact multiple others.

Might I ask who those "some folks" are?

I've been talking to a few groups about this recently, CERT included
(it's actually their mandate to be the ones to do this, but well...)

We should take this off-list...

thanks,

greg k-h