From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S970879AbeEXPL4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 11:11:56 -0400 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:44860 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S968131AbeEXPLx (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 11:11:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 16:11:37 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Guenter Roeck , "Patel, Chintan M" , Jaroslav Kysela , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] ASoC: topology: Improve backwards compatibility with v4 topology files Message-ID: <20180524151137.GY4828@sirena.org.uk> References: <20180522165842.233949-1-groeck@google.com> <20180523135609.GK4828@sirena.org.uk> <20180523155811.GO4828@sirena.org.uk> <20180524141842.GW4828@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OEa2bCMk+rg6xBXy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Excellent day to have a rotten day. User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --OEa2bCMk+rg6xBXy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 07:55:06AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:18 AM Mark Brown wrote: Your mail client formatting seems to be broken, the word wrapping is really funky (it looks like it's breaking longer than 80 column lines in the middle of paragraphs rather than flowing paragraphs within 80 columns). > > > I don't mind adding the structures to > > > sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-tplg-interface.h, > > > but it seems a bit out of scope to tie this with moving the file to > > > include/uapi/sound. > > > I think that should be a separate discussion. > > Is there some reason not to just do it while we're looking at this? I > > don't see why we wouldn't want to do this. > I don't mind doing this. However, keeping the change local and in a single > patch > would make it easier to backport, and I think that the ability to backport > would be > essential to get more than one-person test coverage. I also would have liked > feedback from someone at Intel, at least for the Skylake specific > structures. Oh, of course - I'm just saying we should do this, not that everything needs to be in one patch. Obviously the code motion would be a separate patch. > Anyway, what file do you have in mind for the structure definitions, both > for the ones > in soc-tolopogy.c and the ones needed in skl-topology.c ? Everything into > asoc.h, > or something else ? All of those that can appear in a firmware file, I don't super care where they end up but possibly a separate header file or files to the kernel specific ones as they might get used with Windows. --OEa2bCMk+rg6xBXy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlsG1igACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BPwgf/eVjK3Vi8LMSAcq3hLEUdx7AYPevQdzCZ6kkbjU5TRNe0ioVmn4AUh7/D TkzhNC/FsRufNoR/MOo+Ut4+wD8r6MshEnc9tjHbSjKLS75CyCuMTbHTSHKSqx4+ +ozYYDt++wJIa93KDs4rSKQ83deRFmkVo3EdIJkoIbYOfde3m5UQtngtXGB+YWDR KfwLjh61MQVD4M8gI8CzI2r8Bk0batRJaNEEB793ONqV/xjoB/ShsWrRf9YZkfLN 3VPzmjTZt6+oDiUSHARRh4SXSTPAiYecWlh5ww7IWcjJceQoVE0A34b4HtLJoHS9 Bplb9zSEMU1UhEQYziVkP+KzndXrrg== =f0A1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OEa2bCMk+rg6xBXy--