From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>, Erick Reyes <erickreyes@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Thomas Glexiner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>, Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>, kernel-team@lge.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 16:20:36 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180525232036.GA252027@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180525114339.GA30990@sejong> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 08:43:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Joel, > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 06:21:55PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org> > > > > This patch detaches the preemptirq tracepoints from the tracers and > > keeps it separate. > > > > Advantages: > > * Lockdep and irqsoff event can now run in parallel since they no longer > > have their own calls. > > > > * This unifies the usecase of adding hooks to an irqsoff and irqson > > event, and a preemptoff and preempton event. > > 3 users of the events exist: > > - Lockdep > > - irqsoff and preemptoff tracers > > - irqs and preempt trace events > > > > The unification cleans up several ifdefs and makes the code in preempt > > tracer and irqsoff tracers simpler. It gets rid of all the horrific > > ifdeferry around PROVE_LOCKING and makes configuration of the different > > users of the tracepoints more easy and understandable. It also gets rid > > of the time_* function calls from the lockdep hooks used to call into > > the preemptirq tracer which is not needed anymore. The negative delta in > > lines of code in this patch is quite large too. > > > [SNIP] > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER > > +/* > > + * We are only interested in hardirq on/off events: > > + */ > > +static void tracer_hardirqs_on(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace()) > > + stop_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > +static void tracer_hardirqs_off(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace()) > > + start_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > static int irqsoff_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > trace_type = TRACER_IRQS_OFF; > > > > + register_trace_irq_disable(tracer_hardirqs_off, NULL); > > + register_trace_irq_enable(tracer_hardirqs_on, NULL); > > return __irqsoff_tracer_init(tr); > > } > > > > static void irqsoff_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > + unregister_trace_irq_disable(tracer_hardirqs_off, NULL); > > + unregister_trace_irq_enable(tracer_hardirqs_on, NULL); > > __irqsoff_tracer_reset(tr); > > } > > > > @@ -692,19 +650,37 @@ static struct tracer irqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = > > }; > > # define register_irqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) > > #else > > +static inline void tracer_hardirqs_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > +static inline void tracer_hardirqs_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > Just a nitpick. These lines seem unnecessary since they're used > only when CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER is enabled AFAICS. > > > > # define register_irqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) > > -#endif > > +#endif /* CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER */ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER > > +static void tracer_preempt_on(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (preempt_trace() && !irq_trace()) > > + stop_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > +static void tracer_preempt_off(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (preempt_trace() && !irq_trace()) > > + start_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > static int preemptoff_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > trace_type = TRACER_PREEMPT_OFF; > > > > + register_trace_preempt_disable(tracer_preempt_off, NULL); > > + register_trace_preempt_enable(tracer_preempt_on, NULL); > > return __irqsoff_tracer_init(tr); > > } > > > > static void preemptoff_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > + unregister_trace_preempt_disable(tracer_preempt_off, NULL); > > + unregister_trace_preempt_enable(tracer_preempt_on, NULL); > > __irqsoff_tracer_reset(tr); > > } > > > > @@ -729,21 +705,32 @@ static struct tracer preemptoff_tracer __read_mostly = > > }; > > # define register_preemptoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) > > #else > > +static inline void tracer_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > +static inline void tracer_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > Ditto (for CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER). > > Thanks, > Namhyung Yes you're right, saves quite a few lines actually! I also inlined the register_tracer macros, It seems much cleaner. I will fold the below diff but let me know if there's anything else. Thanks Namhyung! - Joel ---8<----------------------- diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c index d2d8284088f0..d0bcb51d1a2a 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c @@ -648,11 +648,6 @@ static struct tracer irqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; -# define register_irqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -static inline void tracer_hardirqs_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -static inline void tracer_hardirqs_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -# define register_irqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER */ #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER @@ -703,11 +698,6 @@ static struct tracer preemptoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; -# define register_preemptoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -static inline void tracer_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -static inline void tracer_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -# define register_preemptoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER */ #if defined(CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER) @@ -753,18 +743,19 @@ static struct tracer preemptirqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; - -# define register_preemptirqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -# define register_preemptirqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif __init static int init_irqsoff_tracer(void) { - register_irqsoff(irqsoff_tracer); - register_preemptoff(preemptoff_tracer); - register_preemptirqsoff(preemptirqsoff_tracer); - +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER + register_tracer(&irqsoff_tracer); +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER + register_tracer(&preemptoff_tracer); +#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER) + register_tracer(&preemptirqsoff_tracer); +#endif return 0; } core_initcall(init_irqsoff_tracer);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: joel at joelfernandes.org (Joel Fernandes) Subject: [PATCH v7 6/8] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 16:20:36 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180525232036.GA252027@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180525114339.GA30990@sejong> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 08:43:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Joel, > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 06:21:55PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel at joelfernandes.org> > > > > This patch detaches the preemptirq tracepoints from the tracers and > > keeps it separate. > > > > Advantages: > > * Lockdep and irqsoff event can now run in parallel since they no longer > > have their own calls. > > > > * This unifies the usecase of adding hooks to an irqsoff and irqson > > event, and a preemptoff and preempton event. > > 3 users of the events exist: > > - Lockdep > > - irqsoff and preemptoff tracers > > - irqs and preempt trace events > > > > The unification cleans up several ifdefs and makes the code in preempt > > tracer and irqsoff tracers simpler. It gets rid of all the horrific > > ifdeferry around PROVE_LOCKING and makes configuration of the different > > users of the tracepoints more easy and understandable. It also gets rid > > of the time_* function calls from the lockdep hooks used to call into > > the preemptirq tracer which is not needed anymore. The negative delta in > > lines of code in this patch is quite large too. > > > [SNIP] > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER > > +/* > > + * We are only interested in hardirq on/off events: > > + */ > > +static void tracer_hardirqs_on(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace()) > > + stop_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > +static void tracer_hardirqs_off(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace()) > > + start_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > static int irqsoff_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > trace_type = TRACER_IRQS_OFF; > > > > + register_trace_irq_disable(tracer_hardirqs_off, NULL); > > + register_trace_irq_enable(tracer_hardirqs_on, NULL); > > return __irqsoff_tracer_init(tr); > > } > > > > static void irqsoff_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > + unregister_trace_irq_disable(tracer_hardirqs_off, NULL); > > + unregister_trace_irq_enable(tracer_hardirqs_on, NULL); > > __irqsoff_tracer_reset(tr); > > } > > > > @@ -692,19 +650,37 @@ static struct tracer irqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = > > }; > > # define register_irqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) > > #else > > +static inline void tracer_hardirqs_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > +static inline void tracer_hardirqs_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > Just a nitpick. These lines seem unnecessary since they're used > only when CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER is enabled AFAICS. > > > > # define register_irqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) > > -#endif > > +#endif /* CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER */ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER > > +static void tracer_preempt_on(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (preempt_trace() && !irq_trace()) > > + stop_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > +static void tracer_preempt_off(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (preempt_trace() && !irq_trace()) > > + start_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > static int preemptoff_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > trace_type = TRACER_PREEMPT_OFF; > > > > + register_trace_preempt_disable(tracer_preempt_off, NULL); > > + register_trace_preempt_enable(tracer_preempt_on, NULL); > > return __irqsoff_tracer_init(tr); > > } > > > > static void preemptoff_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > + unregister_trace_preempt_disable(tracer_preempt_off, NULL); > > + unregister_trace_preempt_enable(tracer_preempt_on, NULL); > > __irqsoff_tracer_reset(tr); > > } > > > > @@ -729,21 +705,32 @@ static struct tracer preemptoff_tracer __read_mostly = > > }; > > # define register_preemptoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) > > #else > > +static inline void tracer_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > +static inline void tracer_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > Ditto (for CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER). > > Thanks, > Namhyung Yes you're right, saves quite a few lines actually! I also inlined the register_tracer macros, It seems much cleaner. I will fold the below diff but let me know if there's anything else. Thanks Namhyung! - Joel ---8<----------------------- diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c index d2d8284088f0..d0bcb51d1a2a 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c @@ -648,11 +648,6 @@ static struct tracer irqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; -# define register_irqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -static inline void tracer_hardirqs_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -static inline void tracer_hardirqs_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -# define register_irqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER */ #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER @@ -703,11 +698,6 @@ static struct tracer preemptoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; -# define register_preemptoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -static inline void tracer_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -static inline void tracer_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -# define register_preemptoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER */ #if defined(CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER) @@ -753,18 +743,19 @@ static struct tracer preemptirqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; - -# define register_preemptirqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -# define register_preemptirqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif __init static int init_irqsoff_tracer(void) { - register_irqsoff(irqsoff_tracer); - register_preemptoff(preemptoff_tracer); - register_preemptirqsoff(preemptirqsoff_tracer); - +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER + register_tracer(&irqsoff_tracer); +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER + register_tracer(&preemptoff_tracer); +#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER) + register_tracer(&preemptirqsoff_tracer); +#endif return 0; } core_initcall(init_irqsoff_tracer); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: joel@joelfernandes.org (Joel Fernandes) Subject: [PATCH v7 6/8] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 16:20:36 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180525232036.GA252027@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20180525232036.QrkODeBWq7HEIo9WrP5OMPx6QBpmYTXeYrAHDdXhxs4@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180525114339.GA30990@sejong> On Fri, May 25, 2018@08:43:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Joel, > > On Wed, May 23, 2018@06:21:55PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel at joelfernandes.org> > > > > This patch detaches the preemptirq tracepoints from the tracers and > > keeps it separate. > > > > Advantages: > > * Lockdep and irqsoff event can now run in parallel since they no longer > > have their own calls. > > > > * This unifies the usecase of adding hooks to an irqsoff and irqson > > event, and a preemptoff and preempton event. > > 3 users of the events exist: > > - Lockdep > > - irqsoff and preemptoff tracers > > - irqs and preempt trace events > > > > The unification cleans up several ifdefs and makes the code in preempt > > tracer and irqsoff tracers simpler. It gets rid of all the horrific > > ifdeferry around PROVE_LOCKING and makes configuration of the different > > users of the tracepoints more easy and understandable. It also gets rid > > of the time_* function calls from the lockdep hooks used to call into > > the preemptirq tracer which is not needed anymore. The negative delta in > > lines of code in this patch is quite large too. > > > [SNIP] > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER > > +/* > > + * We are only interested in hardirq on/off events: > > + */ > > +static void tracer_hardirqs_on(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace()) > > + stop_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > +static void tracer_hardirqs_off(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace()) > > + start_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > static int irqsoff_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > trace_type = TRACER_IRQS_OFF; > > > > + register_trace_irq_disable(tracer_hardirqs_off, NULL); > > + register_trace_irq_enable(tracer_hardirqs_on, NULL); > > return __irqsoff_tracer_init(tr); > > } > > > > static void irqsoff_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > + unregister_trace_irq_disable(tracer_hardirqs_off, NULL); > > + unregister_trace_irq_enable(tracer_hardirqs_on, NULL); > > __irqsoff_tracer_reset(tr); > > } > > > > @@ -692,19 +650,37 @@ static struct tracer irqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = > > }; > > # define register_irqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) > > #else > > +static inline void tracer_hardirqs_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > +static inline void tracer_hardirqs_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > Just a nitpick. These lines seem unnecessary since they're used > only when CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER is enabled AFAICS. > > > > # define register_irqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) > > -#endif > > +#endif /* CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER */ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER > > +static void tracer_preempt_on(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (preempt_trace() && !irq_trace()) > > + stop_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > +static void tracer_preempt_off(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) > > +{ > > + if (preempt_trace() && !irq_trace()) > > + start_critical_timing(a0, a1); > > +} > > + > > static int preemptoff_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > trace_type = TRACER_PREEMPT_OFF; > > > > + register_trace_preempt_disable(tracer_preempt_off, NULL); > > + register_trace_preempt_enable(tracer_preempt_on, NULL); > > return __irqsoff_tracer_init(tr); > > } > > > > static void preemptoff_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr) > > { > > + unregister_trace_preempt_disable(tracer_preempt_off, NULL); > > + unregister_trace_preempt_enable(tracer_preempt_on, NULL); > > __irqsoff_tracer_reset(tr); > > } > > > > @@ -729,21 +705,32 @@ static struct tracer preemptoff_tracer __read_mostly = > > }; > > # define register_preemptoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) > > #else > > +static inline void tracer_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > +static inline void tracer_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > > Ditto (for CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER). > > Thanks, > Namhyung Yes you're right, saves quite a few lines actually! I also inlined the register_tracer macros, It seems much cleaner. I will fold the below diff but let me know if there's anything else. Thanks Namhyung! - Joel ---8<----------------------- diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c index d2d8284088f0..d0bcb51d1a2a 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c @@ -648,11 +648,6 @@ static struct tracer irqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; -# define register_irqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -static inline void tracer_hardirqs_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -static inline void tracer_hardirqs_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -# define register_irqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER */ #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER @@ -703,11 +698,6 @@ static struct tracer preemptoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; -# define register_preemptoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -static inline void tracer_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -static inline void tracer_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } -# define register_preemptoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER */ #if defined(CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER) @@ -753,18 +743,19 @@ static struct tracer preemptirqsoff_tracer __read_mostly = .allow_instances = true, .use_max_tr = true, }; - -# define register_preemptirqsoff(trace) register_tracer(&trace) -#else -# define register_preemptirqsoff(trace) do { } while (0) #endif __init static int init_irqsoff_tracer(void) { - register_irqsoff(irqsoff_tracer); - register_preemptoff(preemptoff_tracer); - register_preemptirqsoff(preemptirqsoff_tracer); - +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER + register_tracer(&irqsoff_tracer); +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER + register_tracer(&preemptoff_tracer); +#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER) + register_tracer(&preemptirqsoff_tracer); +#endif return 0; } core_initcall(init_irqsoff_tracer); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-25 23:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-05-24 1:21 [PATCH v7 0/8] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf 2018-05-24 1:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] softirq: reorder trace_softirqs_on to prevent lockdep splat Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf 2018-05-24 1:21 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] srcu: Add notrace variants of srcu_read_{lock,unlock} Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf 2018-05-24 1:21 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] srcu: Add notrace variant of srcu_dereference Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf 2018-05-24 1:21 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] trace/irqsoff: Split reset into separate functions Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf 2018-05-24 1:21 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf 2018-05-24 1:21 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf 2018-05-25 11:43 ` Namhyung Kim 2018-05-25 11:43 ` Namhyung Kim 2018-05-25 11:43 ` namhyung 2018-05-25 23:20 ` Joel Fernandes [this message] 2018-05-25 23:20 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-25 23:20 ` joel 2018-05-24 1:21 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf 2018-05-24 1:21 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` Joel Fernandes 2018-05-24 1:21 ` joelaf
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180525232036.GA252027@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com \ --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \ --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \ --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \ --cc=erickreyes@google.com \ --cc=joelaf@google.com \ --cc=julia@ni.com \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \ --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \ --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \ --cc=shuah@kernel.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tkjos@google.com \ --cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.