All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: Remove VLA usage
@ 2018-05-30  0:35 Kees Cook
  2018-05-30  8:19 ` Florian Westphal
  2018-05-30  9:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2018-05-30  0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pablo Neira Ayuso
  Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik, Florian Westphal, David S. Miller,
	netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev, linux-kernel

In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
allocates the maximum size expected for all possible attrs and adds
a sanity-check to make sure nothing gets out of sync.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
index 03ead8a9e90c..0cb395f9627e 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 
 #include <net/netlink.h>
 #include <linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h>
+#include <linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>");
@@ -37,6 +38,11 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO(PF_NETLINK, NETLINK_NETFILTER);
 	rcu_dereference_protected(table[(id)].subsys, \
 				  lockdep_nfnl_is_held((id)))
 
+#define NFTA_MAX_ATTR	max(max(max(NFTA_CHAIN_MAX, NFTA_FLOWTABLE_MAX),\
+				max(NFTA_OBJ_MAX, NFTA_RULE_MAX)),	\
+			    max(NFTA_TABLE_MAX,				\
+				max(NFTA_SET_ELEM_LIST_MAX, NFTA_SET_MAX)))
+
 static struct {
 	struct mutex				mutex;
 	const struct nfnetlink_subsystem __rcu	*subsys;
@@ -185,11 +191,17 @@ static int nfnetlink_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 	{
 		int min_len = nlmsg_total_size(sizeof(struct nfgenmsg));
 		u8 cb_id = NFNL_MSG_TYPE(nlh->nlmsg_type);
-		struct nlattr *cda[ss->cb[cb_id].attr_count + 1];
+		struct nlattr *cda[NFTA_MAX_ATTR + 1];
 		struct nlattr *attr = (void *)nlh + min_len;
 		int attrlen = nlh->nlmsg_len - min_len;
 		__u8 subsys_id = NFNL_SUBSYS_ID(type);
 
+		/* Sanity-check NFTA_MAX_ATTR */
+		if (ss->cb[cb_id].attr_count > NFTA_MAX_ATTR) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		}
+
 		err = nla_parse(cda, ss->cb[cb_id].attr_count, attr, attrlen,
 				ss->cb[cb_id].policy, extack);
 		if (err < 0) {
@@ -379,10 +391,16 @@ static void nfnetlink_rcv_batch(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 		{
 			int min_len = nlmsg_total_size(sizeof(struct nfgenmsg));
 			u8 cb_id = NFNL_MSG_TYPE(nlh->nlmsg_type);
-			struct nlattr *cda[ss->cb[cb_id].attr_count + 1];
+			struct nlattr *cda[NFTA_MAX_ATTR + 1];
 			struct nlattr *attr = (void *)nlh + min_len;
 			int attrlen = nlh->nlmsg_len - min_len;
 
+			/* Sanity-check NFTA_MAX_ATTR */
+			if (ss->cb[cb_id].attr_count > NFTA_MAX_ATTR) {
+				err = -ENOMEM;
+				goto ack;
+			}
+
 			err = nla_parse(cda, ss->cb[cb_id].attr_count, attr,
 					attrlen, ss->cb[cb_id].policy, NULL);
 			if (err < 0)
-- 
2.17.0


-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: Remove VLA usage
  2018-05-30  0:35 [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: Remove VLA usage Kees Cook
@ 2018-05-30  8:19 ` Florian Westphal
  2018-05-30  9:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2018-05-30  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kees Cook
  Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Jozsef Kadlecsik, Florian Westphal,
	David S. Miller, netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev, linux-kernel

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
> allocates the maximum size expected for all possible attrs and adds
> a sanity-check to make sure nothing gets out of sync.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> index 03ead8a9e90c..0cb395f9627e 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  
>  #include <net/netlink.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h>
> +#include <linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
>
>  	const struct nfnetlink_subsystem __rcu	*subsys;
> @@ -185,11 +191,17 @@ static int nfnetlink_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  	{
>  		int min_len = nlmsg_total_size(sizeof(struct nfgenmsg));
>  		u8 cb_id = NFNL_MSG_TYPE(nlh->nlmsg_type);
> -		struct nlattr *cda[ss->cb[cb_id].attr_count + 1];
> +		struct nlattr *cda[NFTA_MAX_ATTR + 1];
>  		struct nlattr *attr = (void *)nlh + min_len;
>  		int attrlen = nlh->nlmsg_len - min_len;
>  		__u8 subsys_id = NFNL_SUBSYS_ID(type);
>  
> +		/* Sanity-check NFTA_MAX_ATTR */
> +		if (ss->cb[cb_id].attr_count > NFTA_MAX_ATTR) {
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}

Would you mind also adding check to nfnetlink_subsys_register, plus WARN()?

That way we'll see that NFTA_MAX_ATTR isn't large enough by virtue
of registration rather than actual use.

Other than that this looks fine to me.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: Remove VLA usage
  2018-05-30  0:35 [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: Remove VLA usage Kees Cook
  2018-05-30  8:19 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2018-05-30  9:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  2018-05-30 19:08   ` Kees Cook
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2018-05-30  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kees Cook
  Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik, Florian Westphal, David S. Miller,
	netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev, linux-kernel

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 05:35:25PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
> allocates the maximum size expected for all possible attrs and adds
> a sanity-check to make sure nothing gets out of sync.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> index 03ead8a9e90c..0cb395f9627e 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  
>  #include <net/netlink.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h>
> +#include <linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
>  
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>");
> @@ -37,6 +38,11 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO(PF_NETLINK, NETLINK_NETFILTER);
>  	rcu_dereference_protected(table[(id)].subsys, \
>  				  lockdep_nfnl_is_held((id)))
>  
> +#define NFTA_MAX_ATTR	max(max(max(NFTA_CHAIN_MAX, NFTA_FLOWTABLE_MAX),\
> +				max(NFTA_OBJ_MAX, NFTA_RULE_MAX)),	\
> +			    max(NFTA_TABLE_MAX,				\
> +				max(NFTA_SET_ELEM_LIST_MAX, NFTA_SET_MAX)))

This is very specific of nftables, there are other nf subsystems using
nfnetlink that may go over this maximum attribute value (grep from
"struct nfnetlink_subsystem").

To remove the VLA, I think we need an artificial maximum attribute
that reasonably large enough.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: Remove VLA usage
  2018-05-30  9:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2018-05-30 19:08   ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2018-05-30 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pablo Neira Ayuso
  Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik, Florian Westphal, David S. Miller,
	netfilter-devel, coreteam, Network Development, LKML

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 05:35:25PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
>> allocates the maximum size expected for all possible attrs and adds
>> a sanity-check to make sure nothing gets out of sync.
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>  net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
>> index 03ead8a9e90c..0cb395f9627e 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>
>>  #include <net/netlink.h>
>>  #include <linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h>
>> +#include <linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
>>
>>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>");
>> @@ -37,6 +38,11 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO(PF_NETLINK, NETLINK_NETFILTER);
>>       rcu_dereference_protected(table[(id)].subsys, \
>>                                 lockdep_nfnl_is_held((id)))
>>
>> +#define NFTA_MAX_ATTR        max(max(max(NFTA_CHAIN_MAX, NFTA_FLOWTABLE_MAX),\
>> +                             max(NFTA_OBJ_MAX, NFTA_RULE_MAX)),      \
>> +                         max(NFTA_TABLE_MAX,                         \
>> +                             max(NFTA_SET_ELEM_LIST_MAX, NFTA_SET_MAX)))
>
> This is very specific of nftables, there are other nf subsystems using
> nfnetlink that may go over this maximum attribute value (grep from
> "struct nfnetlink_subsystem").

Oops, yes. I see that now.

> To remove the VLA, I think we need an artificial maximum attribute
> that reasonably large enough.

git grep insanity:

$ for i in $(git grep -A10 'static .*struct nfnetlink_subsystem' | \
                 grep '\.cb\b' | awk '{print $NF}' | cut -d, -f1)
do git grep -A100 'static .*'"$i\b"; done | \
    grep '\.attr_count\b' | awk -F= '{print $NF}' | \
    sed -e 's/ //g' | cut -d, -f1 | sort -u

and manual counting gets me:

CTA_EXPECT_MAX 12
CTA_MAX 25
CTA_TIMEOUT_MAX 6
IPSET_ATTR_CMD_MAX 11
NFACCT_MAX 9
NFCTH_MAX 7
NFQA_CFG_MAX 6
NFQA_MAX 21
NFTA_CHAIN_MAX 10
NFTA_COMPAT_MAX 4
NFTA_OBJ_MAX 8
NFTA_RULE_MAX 10
NFTA_SET_ELEM_LIST_MAX 5
NFTA_SET_MAX 17
NFTA_TABLE_MAX 6
NFULA_CFG_MAX 7
NFULA_MAX 20
OSF_ATTR_MAX 2

How about 32?

As Florian suggested, I'll add the check in
nfnetlink_subsys_register() with a WARN().

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-30 19:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-30  0:35 [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: Remove VLA usage Kees Cook
2018-05-30  8:19 ` Florian Westphal
2018-05-30  9:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-05-30 19:08   ` Kees Cook

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.