From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joel@joelfernandes.org (Joel Fernandes) Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 10:51:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v8 5/8] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU In-Reply-To: <214539705.3633.1527749441133.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20180530000500.257225-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180530000500.257225-6-joel@joelfernandes.org> <214539705.3633.1527749441133.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Message-ID: <20180531175153.GA129415@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20180531175153.ZQ_3vm0LIB1K650PAEDTd7HWmQmSC8zDUTdE7IvB6Nc@z> On Thu, May 31, 2018@02:50:41AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On May 30, 2018,@2:04 AM, Joel Fernandes joelaf@google.com wrote: > > > From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" > > > > In recent tests with IRQ on/off tracepoints, a large performance > > overhead ~10% is noticed when running hackbench. This is root caused to > > calls to rcu_irq_enter_irqson and rcu_irq_exit_irqson from the > > tracepoint code. Following a long discussion on the list [1] about this, > > we concluded that srcu is a better alternative for use during rcu idle. > > Although it does involve extra barriers, its lighter than the sched-rcu > > version which has to do additional RCU calls to notify RCU idle about > > entry into RCU sections. > > > > In this patch, we change the underlying implementation of the > > trace_*_rcuidle API to use SRCU. This has shown to improve performance > > alot for the high frequency irq enable/disable tracepoints. > > > > Test: Tested idle and preempt/irq tracepoints. > > > > Here are some performance numbers: > > > > With a run of the following 30 times on a single core x86 Qemu instance > > with 1GB memory: > > hackbench -g 4 -f 2 -l 3000 > > > > Completion times in seconds. CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y. > > > > No patches (without this series) > > Mean: 3.048 > > Median: 3.025 > > Std Dev: 0.064 > > > > With Lockdep using irq tracepoints with RCU implementation: > > Mean: 3.451 (-11.66 %) > > Median: 3.447 (-12.22%) > > Std Dev: 0.049 > > > > With Lockdep using irq tracepoints with SRCU implementation (this series): > > Mean: 3.020 (I would consider the improvement against the "without > > this series" case as just noise). > > Median: 3.013 > > Std Dev: 0.033 > > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10344297/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > --- > > include/linux/tracepoint.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > kernel/tracepoint.c | 15 +++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h > > index c94f466d57ef..880794207921 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h > > +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > > */ > > > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -33,6 +34,8 @@ struct trace_eval_map { > > > > #define TRACEPOINT_DEFAULT_PRIO 10 > > > > +extern struct srcu_struct tracepoint_srcu; > > + > > extern int > > tracepoint_probe_register(struct tracepoint *tp, void *probe, void *data); > > extern int > > @@ -75,10 +78,15 @@ int unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier(struct > > notifier_block *nb) > > * probe unregistration and the end of module exit to make sure there is no > > * caller executing a probe when it is freed. > > */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS > > static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) > > { > > + synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu); > > synchronize_sched(); > > } > > +#else > > +static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) { } > > In order to add some consistency to the style in this header file, > this empty function should look like: > > static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) > { } > > (with newline before "{") Ok, I changed it to the style you're proposing. > > +#endif > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS > > extern int syscall_regfunc(void); > > @@ -129,18 +137,38 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); > > * as "(void *, void)". The DECLARE_TRACE_NOARGS() will pass in just > > * "void *data", where as the DECLARE_TRACE() will pass in "void *data, proto". > > */ > > -#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcucheck) \ > > +#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcuidle) \ > > do { \ > > struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr; \ > > void *it_func; \ > > void *__data; \ > > + int __maybe_unused idx = 0; \ > > \ > > if (!(cond)) \ > > return; \ > > - if (rcucheck) \ > > - rcu_irq_enter_irqson(); \ > > - rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \ > > - it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \ > > + \ > > + /* \ > > + * For rcuidle callers, use srcu since sched-rcu \ > > + * doesn't work from the idle path. \ > > + */ \ > > + if (rcuidle) { \ > > + if (in_nmi()) { \ > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); \ > > + return; /* no srcu from nmi */ \ > > I find it odd to have a "return" in a macro that consists of a > do { } while (0). I'm tempted to replace "return" by "break" here, > to break the macro do/while (0) loop. "return;" is also used from "if (!(cond))" above so I prefer be consistent and just use return than break as done above, but please let me know if you still object. > > + } \ > > + \ > > + idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu); \ > > + it_func_ptr = \ > > + srcu_dereference_notrace((tp)->funcs, \ > > + &tracepoint_srcu); \ > > + /* To keep it consistent with !rcuidle path */ \ > > + preempt_disable_notrace(); \ > > + } else { \ > > + rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \ > > + it_func_ptr = \ > > + rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \ > > + } \ > > + \ > > if (it_func_ptr) { \ > > do { \ > > it_func = (it_func_ptr)->func; \ > > @@ -148,9 +176,13 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); > > ((void(*)(proto))(it_func))(args); \ > > } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \ > > } \ > > - rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ > > - if (rcucheck) \ > > - rcu_irq_exit_irqson(); \ > > + \ > > + if (rcuidle) { \ > > + preempt_enable_notrace(); \ > > + srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, idx);\ > > + } else { \ > > + rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ > > + } \ > > } while (0) > > > > #ifndef MODULE > > diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c > > index 1e37da2e0c25..54157792f5ab 100644 > > --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c > > +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c > > @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ > > extern struct tracepoint * const __start___tracepoints_ptrs[]; > > extern struct tracepoint * const __stop___tracepoints_ptrs[]; > > > > +DEFINE_SRCU(tracepoint_srcu); > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_srcu); > > + > > /* Set to 1 to enable tracepoint debug output */ > > static const int tracepoint_debug; > > > > @@ -67,16 +70,26 @@ static inline void *allocate_probes(int count) > > return p == NULL ? NULL : p->probes; > > } > > > > -static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) > > +static void srcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) > > { > > kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu)); > > } > > > > +static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) > > +{ > > + call_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu, head, srcu_free_old_probes); > > +} > > + > > static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint_func *old) > > { > > if (old) { > > struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old, > > struct tp_probes, probes[0]); > > + /* > > + * Tracepoint probes are protected by both sched RCU and SRCU, > > + * by calling the SRCU callback in the sched RCU callback we > > + * cover both cases. So lets chain the SRCU and RCU callbacks. > > lets -> let's > > But I would use a different wording for that sentence that does not include > "let's" which is short for "let us", e.g. > > "Chain the SRCU and sched RCU callbacks to wait for both grace periods." Fixed, thanks. > With the comments above taken care of, please add my: > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers Will do, and thanks for the review! Below is the updated patch. - Joel ---8<----------------------- From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:44:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v8.1] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU In recent tests with IRQ on/off tracepoints, a large performance overhead ~10% is noticed when running hackbench. This is root caused to calls to rcu_irq_enter_irqson and rcu_irq_exit_irqson from the tracepoint code. Following a long discussion on the list [1] about this, we concluded that srcu is a better alternative for use during rcu idle. Although it does involve extra barriers, its lighter than the sched-rcu version which has to do additional RCU calls to notify RCU idle about entry into RCU sections. In this patch, we change the underlying implementation of the trace_*_rcuidle API to use SRCU. This has shown to improve performance alot for the high frequency irq enable/disable tracepoints. Test: Tested idle and preempt/irq tracepoints. Here are some performance numbers: With a run of the following 30 times on a single core x86 Qemu instance with 1GB memory: hackbench -g 4 -f 2 -l 3000 Completion times in seconds. CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y. No patches (without this series) Mean: 3.048 Median: 3.025 Std Dev: 0.064 With Lockdep using irq tracepoints with RCU implementation: Mean: 3.451 (-11.66 %) Median: 3.447 (-12.22%) Std Dev: 0.049 With Lockdep using irq tracepoints with SRCU implementation (this series): Mean: 3.020 (I would consider the improvement against the "without this series" case as just noise). Median: 3.013 Std Dev: 0.033 [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10344297/ Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) --- include/linux/tracepoint.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- kernel/tracepoint.c | 16 ++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h index c94f466d57ef..9cf2882d2ef4 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ */ #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -33,6 +34,8 @@ struct trace_eval_map { #define TRACEPOINT_DEFAULT_PRIO 10 +extern struct srcu_struct tracepoint_srcu; + extern int tracepoint_probe_register(struct tracepoint *tp, void *probe, void *data); extern int @@ -75,10 +78,16 @@ int unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) * probe unregistration and the end of module exit to make sure there is no * caller executing a probe when it is freed. */ +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) { + synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu); synchronize_sched(); } +#else +static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) +{ } +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS extern int syscall_regfunc(void); @@ -129,18 +138,38 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); * as "(void *, void)". The DECLARE_TRACE_NOARGS() will pass in just * "void *data", where as the DECLARE_TRACE() will pass in "void *data, proto". */ -#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcucheck) \ +#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcuidle) \ do { \ struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr; \ void *it_func; \ void *__data; \ + int __maybe_unused idx = 0; \ \ if (!(cond)) \ return; \ - if (rcucheck) \ - rcu_irq_enter_irqson(); \ - rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \ - it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \ + \ + /* \ + * For rcuidle callers, use srcu since sched-rcu \ + * doesn't work from the idle path. \ + */ \ + if (rcuidle) { \ + if (in_nmi()) { \ + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); \ + return; /* no srcu from nmi */ \ + } \ + \ + idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu); \ + it_func_ptr = \ + srcu_dereference_notrace((tp)->funcs, \ + &tracepoint_srcu); \ + /* To keep it consistent with !rcuidle path */ \ + preempt_disable_notrace(); \ + } else { \ + rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \ + it_func_ptr = \ + rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \ + } \ + \ if (it_func_ptr) { \ do { \ it_func = (it_func_ptr)->func; \ @@ -148,9 +177,13 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); ((void(*)(proto))(it_func))(args); \ } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \ } \ - rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ - if (rcucheck) \ - rcu_irq_exit_irqson(); \ + \ + if (rcuidle) { \ + preempt_enable_notrace(); \ + srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, idx);\ + } else { \ + rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ + } \ } while (0) #ifndef MODULE diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c index 1e37da2e0c25..b2e3be589aff 100644 --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ extern struct tracepoint * const __start___tracepoints_ptrs[]; extern struct tracepoint * const __stop___tracepoints_ptrs[]; +DEFINE_SRCU(tracepoint_srcu); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_srcu); + /* Set to 1 to enable tracepoint debug output */ static const int tracepoint_debug; @@ -67,16 +70,27 @@ static inline void *allocate_probes(int count) return p == NULL ? NULL : p->probes; } -static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) +static void srcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) { kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu)); } +static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + call_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu, head, srcu_free_old_probes); +} + static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint_func *old) { if (old) { struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old, struct tp_probes, probes[0]); + /* + * Tracepoint probes are protected by both sched RCU and SRCU, + * by calling the SRCU callback in the sched RCU callback we + * cover both cases. So let us chain the SRCU and sched RCU + * callbacks to wait for both grace periods. + */ call_rcu_sched(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes); } } -- 2.17.0.921.gf22659ad46-goog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html