From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: pkeys on POWER: Access rights not reset on execve
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 19:34:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180608023441.GA5573@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30040030-1aa2-623b-beec-dd1ceb3eb9a7@redhat.com>
>
> So the remaining question at this point is whether the Intel
> behavior (default-deny instead of default-allow) is preferable.
Florian, remind me what behavior needs to fixed?
--
Ram Pai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-08 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-18 14:27 pkeys on POWER: Access rights not reset on execve Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 1:19 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-19 1:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-19 5:26 ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 20:27 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-19 23:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-20 6:04 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-20 6:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-20 19:11 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-21 11:29 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-03 20:18 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 10:12 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-04 14:01 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 17:57 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-04 19:02 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 19:02 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 21:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 2:34 ` Ram Pai [this message]
2018-06-08 5:53 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 10:15 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 10:44 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 10:44 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 12:54 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 12:54 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 12:57 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 12:57 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 13:49 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 13:49 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 13:51 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 13:51 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 14:17 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 14:17 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-11 17:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-11 17:29 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-11 20:08 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-12 12:17 ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 5:12 ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 11:11 ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 11:11 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180608023441.GA5573@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.