From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRGa2-0001FD-KW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:33:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRGa1-0006Gi-Ii for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:33:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::232]:46209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRGa1-0006G0-B9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:33:21 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x232.google.com with SMTP id v13-v6so13226285wrp.13 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 05:33:21 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 13:32:35 +0100 Message-Id: <20180608123307.24773-18-alex.bennee@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <20180608123307.24773-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> References: <20180608123307.24773-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 17/49] tests/tcg/i386: add runner for test-i386-fprem List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: cota@braap.org, famz@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, f4bug@amsat.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, balrogg@gmail.com, aurelien@aurel32.net, agraf@suse.de, pbonzini@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= , Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost The runner needs to compare against a reference run. We also only run this test when SPEED=slow as it takes a while. Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée --- v5 - include test-i386-fprem.ref v5.1 - remove the 69Mb test-i386-fprem.ref - generate test-i386-fprem.ref on developers machine - add TIMEOUT=60 --- tests/tcg/i386/Makefile.target | 16 ++++++++++++++++ tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c | 12 +++++++++--- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/tcg/i386/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/i386/Makefile.target index 8b46cc021e..64d241cfdf 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/i386/Makefile.target +++ b/tests/tcg/i386/Makefile.target @@ -33,5 +33,21 @@ test-i386: test-i386.c test-i386-code16.S test-i386-vm86.S test-i386.h test-i386 run-runcom: runcom pi_10.com $(call quiet-command, $(QEMU) ./runcom $(I386_SRC)/pi_10.com > runcom.out, "TEST", "$< on $(TARGET_NAME)") +ifeq ($(SPEED), slow) + +test-i386-fprem.ref: test-i386-fprem + $(call quiet-command, ./$< > $@,"GENREF","generating $@") + +run-test-i386-fprem: TIMEOUT=60 +run-test-i386-fprem: test-i386-fprem + $(call quiet-command, \ + $(QEMU) $< > $<.out && \ + diff -u $(I386_SRC)/$<.ref $<.out, \ + "TEST", "$< (default) on $(TARGET_NAME)") +else +run-test-i386-fprem: test-i386-fprem + $(call quiet-command, /bin/true, "SLOW TEST", "$< SKIPPED on $(TARGET_NAME)") +endif + # On i386 and x86_64 Linux only supports 4k pages (large pages are a different hack) EXTRA_RUNS+=run-test-mmap-4096 diff --git a/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c b/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c index 1a71623204..66f5a9657d 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c +++ b/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c @@ -23,7 +23,10 @@ * along with this program; if not, see . */ -#include "qemu/osdep.h" +#include +#include + +#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) /* * Inspired by 's union ieee854_long_double, but with single @@ -39,7 +42,7 @@ union float80u { unsigned int exponent:15; unsigned int negative:1; unsigned int empty:16; - } QEMU_PACKED ieee; + } __attribute__((packed)) ieee; /* This is for NaNs in the IEEE 854 double-extended-precision format. */ struct { @@ -49,7 +52,7 @@ union float80u { unsigned int exponent:15; unsigned int negative:1; unsigned int empty:16; - } QEMU_PACKED ieee_nan; + } __attribute__((packed)) ieee_nan; }; #define IEEE854_LONG_DOUBLE_BIAS 0x3fff @@ -229,6 +232,7 @@ static void test_fprem_cases(void) do_fprem_stack_underflow(); printf("= invalid operation =\n"); + do_fprem(q_nan.d, 1.0); do_fprem(s_nan.d, 1.0); do_fprem(1.0, 0.0); do_fprem(pos_inf.d, 1.0); @@ -238,6 +242,8 @@ static void test_fprem_cases(void) do_fprem(pos_denorm.d, 1.0); do_fprem(1.0, pos_denorm.d); + do_fprem(smallest_positive_norm.d, smallest_positive_norm.d); + /* printf("= underflow =\n"); */ /* TODO: Is there a case where FPREM raises underflow? */ } -- 2.17.1