From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] bitmap: Add bitmap_alloc(), bitmap_zalloc() and bitmap_free() Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:14:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20180618141404.68124daab97bd0f3a3051544@linux-foundation.org> References: <20180618131003.88110-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20180618131003.88110-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180618131003.88110-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Shaohua Li , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Yury Norov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, Joe Perches List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:10:01 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > A lot of code become ugly because of open coding allocations for bitmaps. > > Introduce three helpers to allow users be more clear of intention > and keep their code neat. > > ... > > +unsigned long *bitmap_alloc(unsigned int nbits, gfp_t flags) > +{ > + return kmalloc_array(BITS_TO_LONGS(nbits), sizeof(unsigned long), flags); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bitmap_alloc); > + > +unsigned long *bitmap_zalloc(unsigned int nbits, gfp_t flags) > +{ > + return bitmap_alloc(nbits, flags | __GFP_ZERO); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bitmap_zalloc); > + > +void bitmap_free(const unsigned long *bitmap) > +{ > + kfree(bitmap); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bitmap_free); > + I suggest these functions are small and simple enough to justify inlining them.