From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016A1C5CFC1 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECB62075E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:39:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AECB62075E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937576AbeFSKi7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 06:38:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:47282 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937215AbeFSKi5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 06:38:57 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0971435; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 03:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D7753F25D; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 03:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:38:52 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Will Deacon Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org, albert@sifive.com, arnd@arndb.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mattst88@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, palmer@sifive.com, paulus@samba.org, rth@twiddle.net, vgupta@synopsys.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/18] atomics: API cleanups Message-ID: <20180619103851.hftq4gue27ruhe3z@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180618101919.51973-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20180618163805.GE11612@arm.com> <20180618192126.l7qyuthsc6eqkigb@salmiak> <20180619101800.kyue73me67pqktme@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20180619102049.GF13984@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180619102049.GF13984@arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:20:49AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:18:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:21:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:19:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > > This series contains a few cleanups of the atomic API, fixing > > > > > inconsistencies between atomic_* and atomic64_*, and minimizing > > > > > repetition in arch code. This is nicer for arch code, and the improved > > > > > regularity will help when generating the atomic headers in future. > > > > > > > > Apart from the Alpha patch: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Will Deacon > > > > > > Cheers! I assume that also holds with patch 7 fixes up to use s64. > > > > I've pushed out the series with those fixes and your Reviewed-by tags. > > > > Given the whole series has your Reviewed-By and Peter's Acked-by, I > > assume that you're both happy for this to be queued? > > > > What's your prefered way for that to happen? Should I send a v4 with > > those fixes, a pull request, or are you happy to fetch that in a little > > while regardless? > > Probably best to send a v4, then Ingo can take it all via -tip. Ok. > Before you do that, can you also spell-check your commit messages > please? I spotted a bunch of silly typos, and it will save Ingo from > having to fix them up if you do it first. Sorry about that. I've gone through those now, and fixed what I have spotted. I'll give it another pass before I post v4, just in case. :) Thanks, Mark.