From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C785EC5CFC1 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7A320020 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=roeck-us.net header.i=@roeck-us.net header.b="NkKkmqab" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6B7A320020 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030255AbeFSROa (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:14:30 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:37552 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966578AbeFSRO1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:14:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=roeck-us.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References :Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=72xtdwjzXWMRiljhbDuUkrgV3SzDTmRMVjPSmuaiLpk=; b=NkKkmqabXYMBl30Ct2h0Rm/YKq AC8OaTMyGExkOsZ6StDpvIKuHan3B0Bm4XjikFBijsU+EO+XWUB7DthYLApQ0DxHQ2GmfDhAWztrm +E1DKs6nZAcuz2jJb9O5vyGJsHn4E19uzElLH6nDEnNbnNxjTcrRoh2tWlwFchucB0Qd1Osy62UFM Ex0STFM4KpxH+ZB+i0J6Bu1LYXHssHYO5UBvNbybHJwob/zpKyDz+bgAEILgVKE0HMvg06svIVKiB 3pM5Xv2y5lmSmVPefJ7bjbdtDC2wJ3fNLol9SYaQ8e7woqHZGkvPA7e3dVSIB8shuTSuUjIJcwmpJ molZK4PA==; Received: from 108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ([108.223.40.66]:45230 helo=localhost) by bh-25.webhostbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fVKD3-004qIk-Ay; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:14:25 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:14:24 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel , Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: Use logical or instead of addition for badr address calculation Message-ID: <20180619171424.GA16846@roeck-us.net> References: <1529384828-2452-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20180619151235.GH17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180619151235.GH17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 04:12:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > So, I'm going to continue sitting on the fence on this, and basically > take the attitude that it's better that people don't use the new > binutils until binutils people can provide us with an officially > sanctioned solution that's going to work for both older and future > assemblers. > I would so much love if people were working together instead of against each other :-(. Never mind, I'll try a toolchain with binutils 2.28.1. At least that is still supported with buildroot. Guenter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:14:24 -0700 Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: Use logical or instead of addition for badr address calculation In-Reply-To: <20180619151235.GH17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <1529384828-2452-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20180619151235.GH17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20180619171424.GA16846@roeck-us.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 04:12:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > So, I'm going to continue sitting on the fence on this, and basically > take the attitude that it's better that people don't use the new > binutils until binutils people can provide us with an officially > sanctioned solution that's going to work for both older and future > assemblers. > I would so much love if people were working together instead of against each other :-(. Never mind, I'll try a toolchain with binutils 2.28.1. At least that is still supported with buildroot. Guenter