From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA655C1B0F2 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5E2208B7 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:31:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7F5E2208B7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753906AbeFTPbQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:31:16 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:33808 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754113AbeFTPbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:31:12 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5KFPvm5091053 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:31:12 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jqr7bmmh9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:31:11 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:31:10 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.28) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:31:06 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w5KFV5a97143826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:31:05 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24556B2065; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:30:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06848B205F; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:30:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.159]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:30:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0911416C3D48; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:33:07 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: NeilBrown Cc: Linus Torvalds , trondmy@hammerspace.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux NFS Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] rculist: improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20180613010427.GD3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180613013914.GE3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87muvzihr8.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20180613100607.GH3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <874li0g1v3.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20180618170111.GB3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180618170111.GB3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18062015-2213-0000-0000-000002BCBA11 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009227; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000265; SDB=6.01049765; UDB=6.00537924; IPR=6.00828738; MB=3.00021761; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-06-20 15:31:08 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18062015-2214-0000-0000-00005A8C017B Message-Id: <20180620153306.GA18484@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-06-20_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1806200172 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:01:11AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 02:22:40PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > Unfortunately the patch for adding list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() > > wasn't the final patch after all review. It is functionally > > correct but the documentation was incomplete. > > > > This patch adds this missing documentation which includes an update to > > the documentation for list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to match the > > documentation for the new list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(), and adds > > list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() and the already existing > > hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu() to section 7 of whatisRCU.txt. > > > > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown > > Once I rebase my commits to v4.18-rc1, I will apply this, thank you! > > (If you were wanting something else to happen with this patch, please > let me know.) And hearing no objections, I have applied it. Thanx, Paul