From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:34404 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754101AbeFUH1a (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:27:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:27:27 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Keith Busch Cc: Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , Sinan Kaya , Oza Pawandeep Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] PCI/DPC: Defer event handling to work queue Message-ID: <20180621072727.GA18738@infradead.org> References: <20180620213833.25072-1-keith.busch@intel.com> <20180620213833.25072-2-keith.busch@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180620213833.25072-2-keith.busch@intel.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 03:38:28PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > This moves all event handling to the existing work queue, which will > make passing event information simpler to the handler. I wonder if just using a threaded interrupt would be useful for the DPC handler?