From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, tglx@linutronix.de, efault@gmx.de,
songliubraving@fb.com, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] x86,tlb: mm_fill_lazy_tlb_cpu_mask() can be static
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 04:16:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180626201654.GA8061@lkp-ivb-ep02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180626173126.12296-5-riel@surriel.com>
Fixes: 4d7614ce489c ("x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
tlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 03512772..e6d5b01 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ void tlb_flush_remove_tables_local(void *arg)
}
}
-void mm_fill_lazy_tlb_cpu_mask(struct mm_struct *mm, struct cpumask* lazy_cpus)
+static void mm_fill_lazy_tlb_cpu_mask(struct mm_struct *mm, struct cpumask* lazy_cpus)
{
int cpu;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-26 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-26 17:31 [PATCH v2 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86,tlb: leave lazy TLB mode at page table free time Rik van Riel
2018-06-27 6:03 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-27 18:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-27 18:17 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-28 20:05 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 20:16 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-06-26 20:16 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86,switch_mm: skip atomic operations for init_mm Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180626201654.GA8061@lkp-ivb-ep02 \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.