From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B716C6778C for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 07:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43B323F66 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 07:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="LekbfsI8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E43B323F66 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754279AbeGCHCG (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 03:02:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:34312 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753364AbeGCHCD (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2018 03:02:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id a12-v6so748538wro.1 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:02:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=FTr/mx+ESvJK4iazcGo2YZMqwOCdpMPVpIzlOjpbRvU=; b=LekbfsI85qQ6CafxgzuKKiqfTX30oId/r9Ao3fbTElhSKoGHnSg5Zz1a2neP/1GY+g 4jU9m5ggEzXyytRy9QFqjvCZzbCjqP1uKglS+xlciCNWV/wiCb9Dsiq7Ge5EWt444+Rc xDgsSrHQMyp/goCYjTJOqvO0zcWtPaIJz8kC4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FTr/mx+ESvJK4iazcGo2YZMqwOCdpMPVpIzlOjpbRvU=; b=Hf+2iximajG1v6dYunQtGjDvA93gSkfAdCZlJS5FR7BANyVFqZ2oW4HDEbRnBCKY9e 392zluiSUtMp7KMMvQoIWy9CGpheG0i4lRU6UuTRJ0SbN7DHVGCGLBnIdgXLvQIYMvWX Q2ZMizWd+eHRgbXBWKaz0BjZ9XyUv5qhDVcF8pRkDhJ8z176Zg6Qvatg8CYxBP/fIKql QsaxoBiym1zSlMd+WxZ62bceVOcGx5IXzxaKr3X9tOesFi36V7zDofZDvoPSTRqiIAk+ KHBXELdR5bOe+MhwkAg1k2xoRiI6W7yl4CW8l/RrA+kvVcwL30j610XNGyDNYessayTZ M/2w== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1Ea916g9ki8YD+1baUWtwG7ENuAuXOmN4irmVL6cJapzLRr0U8 aT0mww8PXyIrWDWNiNaFeR+hDA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpexlk6R0IWVd4OgPL0sUHJxz58cJP3yl+hbOS4NWPuUUVN5w+gmeq6D7yf/P0/IeWAL91At7A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a401:: with SMTP id d1-v6mr3289778wra.121.1530601322531; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([2.27.167.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 143-v6sm974969wml.37.2018.07.03.00.02.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:02:00 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Matti Vaittinen Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, mazziesaccount@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, sre@kernel.org, chenjh@rock-chips.com, andrew.smirnov@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, heiko@sntech.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, mikko.mutanen@fi.rohmeurope.com, heikki.haikola@fi.rohmeurope.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] mfd/regulator/clk/input: bd71837: ROHM BD71837 PMIC driver Message-ID: <20180703070200.GC20176@dell> References: <20180621103400.GB6076@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180621103400.GB6076@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:55:31PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > Patch series adding support for ROHM BD71837 PMIC. > > > What is the preferred way when I send updated patches: > > 1. always resend _all_ unapplied patches even if there is no changes to > some of them. (patch-vN mail thread contains _all_ unapplied patches) > 2. only resend changed patches (patch-vN mail thread contains only > patches that were changed from patch-vN-1) > > I have currently used approach 1 - so that no patches would be > accidentally forgotten - but downside is that people need to check if > they have already reviewed some of the patches. I'd rather not caused > any extra work. What is the most convenient way for you guys? Option 1 is preferred. Just ensure you apply any tags you have collected so reviewers can see which patches are pending a review. It's also a good idea to keep a succinct change log between the "--" marker and the diff stat where you can state "v4: No change" or the like. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog