On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:51:52AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> There are a couple of users that could benefit from an unlocked variant
> of i2c_smbus_xfer. In response to [1] I dusted off an old series that I
> have had in a branch for a while that adds such a beast. It also converts
> over some users in the i2c-mux department.
> 
> There are a couple of remaining candidates in i2c/busses/i2c-amd756-s4882.c
> and i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2-s4985.c, but frankly, those are just too nasty.
> Why do they unregister the root adapter and then continue to use it? I
> dare not touch that code...
> 
> Anyway, this series looks like a nice cleanup to me, and the recent sccb
> patch from Akinobu Mita could also benefit, as indicated by Wolfram [1].

Applied to for-next, thanks!