From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-free TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV
 sockets in tcp_abort
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 22:11:46 +0900 (KST)
Message-ID: <20180707.221146.161981342461262899.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20180707073140.202004-1-lorenzo@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, astrachan@google.com,
        subashab@codeaurora.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
        dsa@cumulusnetworks.com
To: lorenzo@google.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:53314 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753993AbeGGNLu (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 7 Jul 2018 09:11:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180707073140.202004-1-lorenzo@google.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat,  7 Jul 2018 16:31:40 +0900

> Tested: passes Android sock_diag_test.py, which exercises this codepath

If this Android test case exercises this path, why didn't it trigger
the double free and thus cause this bug to be found much sooner?

Just curious.