From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] Modify action API for implementing
 lockless actions
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2018 12:43:25 +0900 (KST)
Message-ID: <20180708.124325.344679298289898945.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1530800673-12280-1-git-send-email-vladbu@mellanox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
        jiri@resnulli.us, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
        kliteyn@mellanox.com
To: vladbu@mellanox.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:37728 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754509AbeGHDnb (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 7 Jul 2018 23:43:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1530800673-12280-1-git-send-email-vladbu@mellanox.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Jul 2018 17:24:22 +0300

> Currently, all netlink protocol handlers for updating rules, actions and
> qdiscs are protected with single global rtnl lock which removes any
> possibility for parallelism. This patch set is a first step to remove
> rtnl lock dependency from TC rules update path.
 ...

I'll apply this for now, I reviewed it a few more times and I see
where you are going with this.

I hope there are no new performance regressions in the control path
for cases people care about, and if there are I definitely expect
you to address them.

Thank you.