All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rostedt@goodmis.org (Steven Rostedt)
Subject: [PATCH v9 6/7] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:47:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710204707.2fbaef87@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180711004707.dVNPKpEHgUvfcvwAaI0aRIxEOu91ql_w2urwjAiPrSE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628182149.226164-7-joel@joelfernandes.org>

On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:21:48 -0700
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:

> From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel at joelfernandes.org>
> 
> In this patch we introduce a test module for simulating a long atomic
> section in the kernel which the preemptoff or irqsoff tracers can
> detect. This module is to be used only for test purposes and is default
> disabled.
> 
> Following is the expected output (only briefly shown) that can be parsed
> to verify that the tracers are working correctly. We will use this from
> the kselftests in future patches.
> 
> For the preemptoff tracer:
> 
> echo preemptoff > /d/tracing/current_tracer
> sleep 1
> insmod ./test_atomic_sections.ko atomic_mode=preempt atomic_time=500000
> sleep 1
> bash-4.3# cat /d/tracing/trace
> preempt -1066    2...2    0us@: atomic_sect_run <-atomic_sect_run
> preempt -1066    2...2 500002us : atomic_sect_run <-atomic_sect_run
> preempt -1066    2...2 500004us : tracer_preempt_on <-atomic_sect_run
> preempt -1066    2...2 500012us : <stack trace>
>  => kthread
>  => ret_from_fork  
> 
> For the irqsoff tracer:
> 
> echo irqsoff > /d/tracing/current_tracer
> sleep 1
> insmod ./test_atomic_sections.ko atomic_mode=irq atomic_time=500000
> sleep 1
> bash-4.3# cat /d/tracing/trace
> irq dis -1069    1d..1    0us@: atomic_sect_run
> irq dis -1069    1d..1 500001us : atomic_sect_run
> irq dis -1069    1d..1 500002us : tracer_hardirqs_on <-atomic_sect_run
> irq dis -1069    1d..1 500005us : <stack trace>
>  => ret_from_fork  
> 
> Co-developed-by: Erick Reyes <erickreyes at google.com>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel at joelfernandes.org>
> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug          |  8 ++++
>  lib/Makefile               |  1 +
>  lib/test_atomic_sections.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I think this code should reside in kernel/trace directory. I already
have modules there. See the ring_buffer_benchmark code and the test
module for mmio tracer.

>  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/test_atomic_sections.c
> 
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 8838d1158d19..622c90e1e066 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1956,6 +1956,14 @@ config TEST_KMOD
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config TEST_ATOMIC_SECTIONS
> +	tristate "Simulate atomic sections for tracers to detect"

Hmm, I don't like this title. It's not very obvious to what it is
about. What about "Preempt / IRQ disable delay thread to test latency
tracers" ? Or something along those lines.


> +	depends on m
> +	help
> +	  Select this option to build a test module that can help test atomic
> +	  sections by simulating them with a duration supplied as a module
> +	  parameter. Preempt disable and irq disable modes can be requested.

"If unsure say N"

> +
>  config TEST_DEBUG_VIRTUAL
>  	tristate "Test CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL feature"
>  	depends on DEBUG_VIRTUAL
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> index 90dc5520b784..7831e747bf72 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ obj-y += string_helpers.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_STRING_HELPERS) += test-string_helpers.o
>  obj-y += hexdump.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_HEXDUMP) += test_hexdump.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_ATOMIC_SECTIONS) += test_atomic_sections.o
>  obj-y += kstrtox.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FIND_BIT_BENCHMARK) += find_bit_benchmark.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_BPF) += test_bpf.o
> diff --git a/lib/test_atomic_sections.c b/lib/test_atomic_sections.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1eef518f0974
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/test_atomic_sections.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Atomic section emulation test module
> + *
> + * Emulates atomic sections by disabling IRQs or preemption
> + * and doing a busy wait for a specified amount of time.
> + * This can be used for testing of different atomic section
> + * tracers such as irqsoff tracers.
> + *
> + * (c) 2018. Google LLC
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +
> +static ulong atomic_time = 100;
> +static char atomic_mode[10] = "irq";
> +
> +module_param_named(atomic_time, atomic_time, ulong, S_IRUGO);
> +module_param_string(atomic_mode, atomic_mode, 10, S_IRUGO);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(atomic_time, "Period in microseconds (100 uS default)");

It's not a "Period", it's a delay. "Length of time in critical section"

> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(atomic_mode, "Mode of the test such as preempt or irq (default irq)");

  "Mode of the test: preempt or irq disabled (default irq)"

> +
> +static void busy_wait(ulong time)
> +{
> +	ktime_t start, end;
> +	start = ktime_get();
> +	do {
> +		end = ktime_get();
> +		if (kthread_should_stop())
> +			break;
> +	} while (ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(end, start)) < (time * 1000));
> +}
> +
> +int atomic_sect_run(void *data)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	if (!strcmp(atomic_mode, "irq")) {
> +		local_irq_save(flags);
> +		busy_wait(atomic_time);
> +		local_irq_restore(flags);
> +	} else if (!strcmp(atomic_mode, "preempt")) {
> +		preempt_disable();
> +		busy_wait(atomic_time);
> +		preempt_enable();
> +	}

So this is a one shot deal? That should be explained somewhere,
probably in the config help message. In fact, I think the config help
message should show how to use this.

-- Steve

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init atomic_sect_init(void)
> +{
> +	char task_name[50];
> +	struct task_struct *test_task;
> +
> +	snprintf(task_name, sizeof(task_name), "%s_test", atomic_mode);
> +
> +	test_task = kthread_run(atomic_sect_run, NULL, task_name);
> +	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(test_task);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit atomic_sect_exit(void)
> +{
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +module_init(atomic_sect_init)
> +module_exit(atomic_sect_exit)
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 156+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-07 20:38 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38   ` joelaf
2018-06-21 22:32 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:36 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:36   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:36   ` joelaf
2018-06-28 18:21 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] srcu: Add notrace variants of srcu_read_{lock,unlock} Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] srcu: Add notrace variant of srcu_dereference Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] trace/irqsoff: Split reset into separate functions Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-07-11 12:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:49     ` peterz
2018-07-11 13:00     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:00       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:00       ` rostedt
2018-07-11 14:27       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 14:27         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 14:27         ` paulmck
2018-07-11 14:46         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 14:46           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 14:46           ` rostedt
2018-07-11 15:15           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 15:15             ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 15:15             ` paulmck
2018-07-11 20:56             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:56               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:56               ` joel
2018-07-12  1:22               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  1:22                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  1:22                 ` rostedt
2018-07-12  2:35                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  2:35                   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  2:35                   ` joel
2018-07-11 20:52           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:52             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:52             ` joel
2018-07-12  3:21             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  3:21               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  3:21               ` rostedt
2018-07-12  4:28               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  4:28                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  4:28                 ` joel
2018-07-12 13:35                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 13:35                   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 13:35                   ` rostedt
2018-07-12 19:17                   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 19:17                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 19:17                     ` joel
2018-07-12 20:15                     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:15                       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:15                       ` rostedt
2018-07-12 20:29                       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 20:29                         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 20:29                         ` joel
2018-07-12 20:31                         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:31                           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:31                           ` rostedt
2018-07-11 12:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:53     ` peterz
2018-07-12  2:32     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  2:32       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  2:32       ` joel
2018-07-11 12:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:56     ` peterz
2018-07-11 13:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:06       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:06       ` rostedt
2018-07-11 15:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 15:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 15:17         ` peterz
2018-07-11 15:26         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 15:26           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 15:26           ` rostedt
2018-07-11 16:46           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:46             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:46             ` mathieu.desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40           ` mathieu.desnoyers
2018-07-12  0:31       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  0:31         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  0:31         ` joel
2018-07-12  1:26         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  1:26           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  1:26           ` rostedt
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-07-06 22:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-06 22:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-06 22:06     ` rostedt
2018-07-07  4:20     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-07  4:20       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-07  4:20       ` joel
2018-07-10 14:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-10 14:20     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-10 14:20     ` rostedt
2018-07-10 17:33     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-10 17:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-10 17:33       ` joel
2018-07-11 13:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:12     ` peterz
2018-07-11 13:19     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:19       ` rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22         ` rostedt
2018-07-12  8:38       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  8:38         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  8:38         ` joel
2018-07-12 13:37         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 13:37           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 13:37           ` rostedt
2018-07-12  0:44     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  0:44       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  0:44       ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-07-11  0:47   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-07-11  0:47     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  0:47     ` rostedt
2018-07-11  5:26     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  5:26       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  5:26       ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-07-11  0:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  0:49     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  0:49     ` rostedt
2018-07-11  5:27     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  5:27       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  5:27       ` joel
2018-07-03 14:15 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-07-03 14:15   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-03 14:15   ` joel
2018-07-03 14:23   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-03 14:23     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-03 14:23     ` rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180710204707.2fbaef87@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.