From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm,
 oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:08:45 +0300
Message-ID: <20180711120845.GA7750__31631.8167643205$1531310850$gmane$org@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
References: <20180622150242.16558-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
 <20180627074421.GF32348@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180709122908.GJ22049@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180710134040.GG3014@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
 <20180710141410.GP14284@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180710162020.GJ3014@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
 <20180711090353.GD20050@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180711101447.GU3014@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
 <20180711111318.GL20050@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8209887834458372162=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org>
Received: from us1-rack-dfw2.inumbo.com ([104.130.134.6])
 by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <srs0=25lf=j3=kernel.org=leon@srs-us1.protection.inumbo.net>)
 id 1fdDvO-0005py-Ax
 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:08:50 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20180711111318.GL20050@dhcp22.suse.cz>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org
Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>, Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>Mike Marciniszyn <mi>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============8209887834458372162==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s"
Content-Disposition: inline


--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:13:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 11-07-18 13:14:47, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 10-07-18 19:20:20, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 04:14:10PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Tue 10-07-18 16:40:40, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed 27-06-18 09:44:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > > > > This is the v2 of RFC based on the feedback I've received so far. The
> > > > > > > > code even compiles as a bonus ;) I haven't runtime tested it yet, mostly
> > > > > > > > because I have no idea how.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any further feedback is highly appreciated of course.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any other feedback before I post this as non-RFC?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From mlx5 perspective, who is primary user of umem_odp.c your change looks ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can I assume your Acked-by?
> > > >
> > > > I didn't have a chance to test it because it applies on our rdma-next, but
> > > > fails to compile.
> > >
> > > What is the compilation problem? Is it caused by the patch or some other
> > > unrelated changed?
> >
> > Thanks for pushing me to take a look on it.
> > Your patch needs the following hunk to properly compile at least on my system.
>
> I suspect you were trying the original version. I've posted an updated
> patch here http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180627074421.GF32348@dhcp22.suse.cz
> and all these issues should be fixed there. Including many other fixes.
>

Ohh, you used --reply-to, IMHO it is best way to make sure that the
patch will be lost :)

> Could you have a look at that one please?

I grabbed it, the results will be overnight only.

Thanks

> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=g6/F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--


--===============8209887834458372162==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVucHJvamVjdC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0
cy54ZW5wcm9qZWN0Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3hlbi1kZXZlbA==

--===============8209887834458372162==--